Question 201

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit A network engineer configured the redistribute connected subnets route-map filtering command on R1 to redistribute connected interfaces to the OSPF process The engineer also wants to filter out IP address 10 0 1 0/24. but the prefix still appears in the routing tables of the other routers on the network. Which action corrects the problem?
  • Question 202


    Refer to the exhibit. After you applied these configurations to routers R1 and R2, the two devices could not form a neighbor relationship. Which reason for the problem is the most likely?
  • Question 203

    After an engineer configures BGP in R1, it starts receiving this message
    *Jun 29 13:30:50.122: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 192.168.10.1 Down User reset Jun 29 13:30:52.341: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 192.168.10.1 2/6 (unacceptable hold time) 0 bytes Which action makes the peering come back up again?
  • Question 204

    Guidelines
    This is a lab item in which tasks will be performed on virtual devices.
    Refer to the Tasks tab to view the tasks for this lab item.
    Refer to the Topology tab to access the device console(s) and perform the tasks.
    Console access is available for all required devices by clicking the device icon or using the tab(s) above the console window.
    All necessary preconfigurations have been applied.
    Do not change the enable password or hostname for any device.
    Save your configurations to NVRAM before moving to the next item.
    Click Next at the bottom of the screen to submit this lab and move to the next question.
    When Next is clicked, the lab doses and cannot be reopened.
    Topology

    Tasks
    Configure and verify an OSPF neighbor adjacency between R1 and R2 in OSPF area 0 according to the topology to achieve these goals:
    1. R1 pings the Loopback0 interface of R2. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task.
    2. R2 pings the Loopback0 interface of R1. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task.
    3. R2 receives a single summary route 172.16.100.0/22 for networks 172.16.100.0/24, 172.16.101.0/24, and 172.16.103.0/24.

    Question 205

    Refer to the exhibit. CE1 and CE2 are iBGP neighbors in AS 65516. All traffic that exits AS 65516 must use the link from CE1 to PE1. CE1 is advertising a higher local preference to CE2, but traffic from CE2 still prefers the PE2 link. Which action corrects the problem?