Given the log entry:
011f0005:3: HTTP header (32800) exceeded maximum allowed size of 32768 (Client sidE. vip=/Common/ VS_web profile=http pool=/Common/POOL_web client_ip=10.0.0.1)
Which HTTP profile setting can be modified temporarily to resolve the issue?

The LTM Specialist is writing a custom HTTP monitor for a web application and has viewed the content by accessing the site directly via their browser. The monitor continually fails. The monitor configuration is:
ltm monitor http /Common/exampleComMonitor {
defaults-from /Common/http
destination *:*
interval 5
recv "Recent Searches"
send "GET /app/feed/current\?uid=20145 HTTP/1.1\\r\\nHost:
www.example.com\\r\\nAccept-EncodinG.gzip, deflate\\r\\nConnection: close\\r\\n\\r\\n"
time-until-up 0
timeout 16
}
A trace shows the following request and response:
Request:
GET /app/feed/current?uid=20145 HTTP/1.1
Host www.example.com
Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate
Connection: close
Response: HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily Date Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:45:52 GMT Server Apache Location https://example.com/login.jsp Content-Encoding gzip Content-Type text/html;charset=UTF-8 Set-CookiE.JSESSIONID=261EFFBDA8EC3036FBCC22D991AC6835;
Path=/app/feed/current?uid=20145
What is the problem?

An LTM Specialist configures the following iRule on an LTM device:
when HTTP_REQUEST {
if {[string tolower [HTTP::uri]] contains "/URI1/" } {
pool Pool1
} elseif {[string tolower [HTTP::uri]] contains "/URI2/" } { pool Pool2 } elseif {[string tolower [HTTP::uri]] contains "/URI3/" } { pool Pool3 } else { pool Pool4}
}
Given the following request: http://www.example.comURI1/index.html?fu=bar&pass=1234
Which pool will be selected by the iRule?

-- Exhibit-

-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
Which step should an LTM Specialist take next to finish upgrading to HD1.3?

-- Exhibit-

-- Exhibit -
Refer to the exhibit.
A pair of LTM devices are configured for HA. The LTM Specialist observes from a capture that there is a successful connection from a client directly to a web server and an unsuccessful connection from a client via the LTM device to the same web server.
Which two solutions will solve the configuration problem? (Choose two.)