An LTM Specialist has configured a virtual server for www.example.com, load balancing connections to a pool of application servers that provide a shopping cart application. Cookie persistence is enabled on the virtual server. Users are able to connect to the application, but the user's shopping cart fails to update. A traffic capture shows the following:
Request:
GET /cart/updatecart.php HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
Connection: keep-alive
Cache-Control: max-age=0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/22.0.1229.94 Safari/537.4 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-EncodinG. gzip,deflate,sdch Accept-LanguagE. en-US,en;q=0.8 Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 CookiE. BIGipServerwebstore_pool=353636524.20480.0000 Response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
DatE. Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:00:13 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu)
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1
Set-CookiE. cartID=647A5EA6657828C69DB8188981CB5; path=/; domain=wb01.example.com Keep-AlivE. timeout=5, max=100 Connection: Keep-Alive Content-TypE. text/html No changes can be made to the application.
What should the LTM Specialist do to resolve the problem?

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue with a new virtual server. When connecting through the virtual server, clients receive the message "The connection was reset" in the browser, although connections directly to the pool member show the application is functioning correctly.
ltm pool srv1_https_pool {
members {
192.168.2.1:https{
address 192.168.2.1
}
}
}
ltm virtual https_example_vs {
destination 192.168.1.155:https
ip-protocol tcp
mask 255.255.255.255
pool srv1_https_pool
profiles {
http { }
tcp { }
}
snat automap
vlans-disabled
}
How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

-- Exhibit -

-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
An LTM device is used to load balance web content over a secure channel.
The developers of the web content have done a trace using an HTTP profiler application. They believe that allowing the LTM device to compress traffic to the client will improve performance. The client can utilize GZIP or deflate compression algorithms.
An LTM Specialist must implement the compression.
The LTM Specialist has completed the following actions:
1. Create the relevant profile.
2. Apply the relevant profile to the virtual server (VS).
After applying the relevant profile, the LTM device is failing to compress the traffic. Instead, the traffic is being served with an error.
What is the problem?

A 8IG-IP Administrator configures a Virtual Server to load balance traffic between 50 webservers for an ecommerce website Traffic is being load balanced using the Least Connections (node) method.
The webserver administrators report that customers are losing the contents from their shopping carts and are unable to complete their orders.
What should the BIG-IP Administrator do to resolve the issue?

The network team introduces a new subnet 10.10.22.0/24 to the network. The route needs to be configured on the F5 device to access this network via the 30.30.30.158 gateway.
How should the LTM Specialist configure thisroute?