The administrator should create a Committed Scenario for the migration project. In VCF Operations, a standard What-If scenario models possible capacity impact, but a committed scenario is used when the organization has decided that capacity must be reserved for an upcoming or planned workload. The documentation states that when you are sure capacity must be reserved, you commit the scenario so VCF Operations sets aside resources for the planned workload, even before the actual changes are implemented .
This directly satisfies the requirement that the migration capacity must not be consumed by other projects over the 12-month migration window. VCF Operations also explains that committed scenarios help capacity and operations teams understand current capacity and future capacity requirements, and that committed capacity prevents ad hoc resource increases from consuming resources while capacity planning is underway .
Option B merges unrelated planning events and does not reserve capacity independently. Option C is for migration to VMware Cloud services, not unmanaged vCenter-to-VCF workload-domain migration. Option D delays future projects but does not reserve the migration capacity. Reference topic: Objective 4.3 - What-If Analysis / Committed Scenarios / Capacity Reservation .

The applied policy is policy 2a because VCF Operations resolves multiple policy assignments by using active policy priority , not by custom group name, policy inheritance tree location, or alphabetical order. The exhibit shows policy 2a as active with priority 1 , policy 1a as active with priority 2 , and policy 2 as active with priority 3 . policy 1 is inactive, so it is not eligible to become the effective policy for the workload. VCF Operations documentation states that policies are applied in priority order as shown on the Active Policies tab, and that priority 1 is the highest priority. It further states that when an object is a member of multiple object groups and each group has a different policy assigned, VCF Operations associates the highest ranking policy with that object . Therefore, even though Workload-01 belongs to all four custom groups, the effective policy is the active policy with the highest rank: policy 2a . Reference topic: Objective 4.5 - Managing VCF Operations with VCF Policy / Policy Hierarchy / Policy Assignment / Active Policy Priority .

The best view is a Distribution View using Host System objects and the relevant memory ballooning metric.
The requirement is to graphically identify which ESX hosts show the highest ballooning activity, not simply to export a table or trend a single host over time. VCF Operations provides multiple view types to interpret metrics, properties, and policies for monitored objects, and Distribution View is used when the administrator needs a graphical representation of how object metric values are distributed across the environment . Host System metrics include memory-related metrics collected from vCenter Server components, making ESX hosts the correct subject for this view . A List View would show the data in rows and columns, but the question asks for a graphical representation. A Trend View is used for historical trends and forecasts, not the best fit for comparing which hosts are currently in the highest ballooning range . A cluster-level Summary View would aggregate the data and obscure the individual host responsible for ballooning. Reference topic:
Objective 4.10 - Custom Views / Distribution View / Host System Memory Metrics .