This situation represents one of the paradoxes in estimating severity that one needs to be aware of - the improvement in controls reduces the weight of the body/middle of the distribution and moves it towards the tails (as the total probability under the curve must stay at 100%) and the distributionbecomes more heavy tailed. As a result, the 99.9th percentile loss actually increases. instead of decreasing, creating a counterintuitive result. Therefore the correct answer is that the capital required will increase.
If scenario analysis produces such a result, the analyst must question if the 1 in 100 year loss severity is still accurate. If the new control has reduced the severity in the body of the distribution, the question as to why the more extreme losses have not changed should be raised.

Altman's Z-score, the Probit and the Logit models can all be used to assess the credit rating of anindividual borrower.There is no such model as the 'distance to default model', and therefore Choice 'a' is the correct answer.

Volatility clustering leads to levels of current volatility that can be significantly different from long run averages. When volatility is running high, institutions need to shed risk, and when it is running low, they can afford to increase returns by taking on more risk for a given amount of capital. An institution's response to changes in volatility can be either to adjust risk, or capital, or both. Accounting for volatility clustering helps institutions manage their risk and capital and therefore statements I and II are correct.
Regulatory requirements do not require volatility clustering to be taken into account (at least not yet).
Therefore statement III is not correct, and neither is IV which is completely unrelated to volatility clustering.

A bank's stress testing programme in relation to firm wide stress tests should document the type, frequency and the purpose of the programme, as well as methodologies for defining scenarios and the remedial actions envisaged. Choice 'b' is therefore a necessary attribute of a robust stress testing programme.
The programme should be supported by a robust systems infrastructure that allows the execution of periodic as well as ad-hoc stress tests at the right level (business unit, as well as firm-wide) at the right level of detail or granularity. Choice 'c' also therefore is a valid choice.
A related element is data quality - without which no stress tests can be be credible.
Therefore all the choices listed are correct and Choice 'd' is the correct answer.

Component VaR measures the proportion of total VaR that can be allocated to each asset in the portfolio. It is based upon the covariance matrix multiplied by the weights, and each row represents the component VaR for the asset in question. Since the total of such a matrix is the total VaR, component VaR is additive. Component VaR is used to assess the contribution of each asset in the portfolio to total risk and has the useful property of being additive so some sense can be made of the contribution of each asset to total risk.
Incremental VaR, conditional VaR and VaR are sub-additive by definition, and therefore not the correct answer.