* Understanding Fraud Risk Management Responses:
* Risk mitigation refers to implementing controls or measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk.
* In this case, by implementing additional internal controls, management aims to mitigate the identified fraud risk.
* Definition of Other Options:
* A. Assuming the risk: This refers to accepting the risk without taking action to mitigate it. This is generally done when the risk is deemed tolerable.
* C. Avoiding the risk: This involves changing business practices or ceasing activities to eliminate the risk entirely.
* D. Transferring the risk: This occurs when the responsibility for the risk is shifted to another party, such as through insurance.
* Conclusion:The described response clearly aligns with risk mitigation, as it focuses on reducing the risk through internal control measures.

Effectiveness of Consistent Punishment:
* Consistent punishment demonstrates an organization's commitment to enforcing anti-fraud policies and serves as a deterrent to potential fraudsters.
Why A is Correct:
* When perpetrators are consistently punished, it sends a strong message about zero tolerance for fraud and reinforces the importance of compliance throughout the organization.
References:
* ACFE guidance on fraud deterrence emphasizes the role of consequences in preventing fraud.

* Risks Associated with Specialized Departments:
* While specialization improves efficiency, it can create silos that hinder communication, coordination, and oversight, increasing fraud risk.
* Isolated departments may lack cross-functional checks and balances.
* Conclusion:Specialized departments often increase fraud risk if not managed with proper controls and oversight.
References:ACFE materials on fraud risk management and departmental structures.