Online Access Free CGSS Practice Test

The roles of the HM Treasury (Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation) includes the following except?

• A.Enforces breaches of trade sanctions
• B.Makes designations under UK domestic regimes
• C.UK's competent authority for implementing financial sanctions
• D.Can impose monetary penalties
• E.Investigates breaches of financial sanctions

The actions of the US President on sanctions differ according to the sort of nation he is sanctioning. All three types of nations have different decision calculations, and the calculation changes from the decision to apply to the decision to amend sanctions.
Specifically, the President penalizes non-Latin American and non-Communist countries for:

• A.Domestic reasons
• B.Personal reasons
• C.Economic reasons
• D.International causes

In the case of Libya, in January 1992, the Security Council described terrorist activities as a threat to:

• A.Local security
• B.International peace
• C.International security
• D.Local markets

To whom does the person who jointly own an asset with the designated person can sell his share under existing licensing grounds?

• A.The designated person's family member.
• B.The designated person.
• C.To the OFSI.
• D.A third party who has agreed to hold it for the benefit of the designated person.
• E.The share cannot be sold.

Rule 11 is not directly applicable to administrative proceedings.
Which of the following is related to this circumstance?

• A.Whelan v. Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP, No. 3:99-CV-0337-P, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15979, at *20 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 13, 1999) - Lifetime permanent injunction enjoining attorney from local bankruptcy practice was excessive.
• B.Chalais v. Milton Bradley Co., No. 95 Civ. 0737 (MBM), 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13438, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 1996) - "[I]mpecunious individual practitioners are just as capable of generating unnecessary work as wealthy firms, and they are no less bound by the rules."
• C.Nuwesra v. Merrill Lynch, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 174 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 1999), the Second Circuit vacated the district court's sua sponte award of $25,000 in attorneys' fees to the defendants in an ADA case.
• D.TriState Steel Constr. Co. v. Herman, 164 F.3d 973, 979 (6th Cir. 1999) - Proceeding before the Occupational Safety-Health Review Commission
• E.Lorentzen v. Anderson Pest Control, 64 F.3d 327, 330 (7th Cir. 1995) - Upholding sanctions award of fees where "only a substantial monetary sanction would deter [the sanctioned party] from engaging in similar conduct in the future".