Section: Protection of Information Assets
Explanation:
Due to the additional cost of disaster recovery planning (DRP) measures, the cost of normal operations for
any organization will always increase after a DRP implementation, i.e., the cost of normal operations during
a nondisaster period will be more than the cost of operations during a nondisaster period when no disaster
recovery plan was in place.

The most important benefit of involving IS audit when implementing governance of enterprise IT is providing independent and objective feedback to facilitate improvement of IT processes.Governance of enterprise IT is the process of ensuring that IT supports the organization's strategy, goals, and objectives in an effective, efficient, ethical, and compliant manner. IS audit can provide value to governance of enterprise IT by assessing the alignment of IT with business needs, evaluating the performance and value delivery of IT, identifying risks and issues related to IT, recommending corrective actions and best practices, and monitoring the implementation and effectiveness of IT governance activities. IS audit can also provide assurance that IT governance processes are designed and operating in accordance with relevant standards, frameworks, laws, regulations, and contractual obligations. Identifying relevant roles for an enterprise IT governance framework is a benefit of involving IS audit when implementing governance of enterprise IT, but not the most important one. IS audit can help define and clarify the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders involved in IT governance, such as board members, senior management, business units, IT function, external parties, etc. IS audit can also help ensure that these roles are aligned with the organization's strategy, goals, and objectives, and that they have adequate authority, accountability, communication, and reporting mechanisms. However, this benefit is more related to the design phase of IT governance implementation than to the ongoing monitoring and improvement phase. Making decisions regarding risk response and monitoring of residual risk is a benefit of involving IS audit when implementing governance of enterprise IT, but not the most important one. IS audit can help identify and assess the risks associated with IT activities and processes, such as strategic risks, operational risks, compliance risks, security risks, etc. IS audit can also help evaluate the effectiveness of risk management practices and controls implemented by management to mitigate or reduce these risks. However, this benefit is more related to the assurance function of IS audit than to its advisory function. Verifying that legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements are being met is a benefit of involving IS audit when implementing governance of enterprise IT, but not the most important one. IS audit can help verify that IT activities and processes comply with applicable laws, regulations, and contractual obligations, such as data protection laws, privacy laws, cybersecurity laws, industry standards, service level agreements, etc. IS audit can also help identify and report any instances of noncompliance or violations that could result in legal or reputational consequences for the organization. However, this benefit is more related to the assurance function of IS audit than to its advisory function. References: ISACA CISA Review Manual 27th Edition, page 283

If the conference rooms have access to the corporate network, unauthorized users may be able to connect to the corporate network; therefore, both networks should be isolated either via a firewall or being physically separated. An I PS would detect possible attacks, but only after they have occurred. A single sign-on would ease authentication management. Antivirus software would reduce the impact of possible viruses; however, unauthorized users would still be able to access the corporate network, which is the biggest risk.

IT application owners having sole responsibility for architecture approval (B) is a major concern because it indicates a lack of oversight and segregation of duties. EA decisions should be reviewed by a cross-functional governance body to ensure alignment with security, compliance, and business objectives.
Other options:
The CIO chairing the review board (A) may indicate centralized leadership but is not inherently a risk.
EA governing non-IT projects (C) may indicate scope expansion but is not a security risk.
Security requirements being reviewed (D) is a best practice and not a concern.
Reference: ISACA CISA Review Manual, IT Governance and Management of IT