The best process measure to evaluate effective clinical care in a new urgent care clinic is the percentage of antibiotic prescriptions that meet evidence-based guidelines. This measure directly reflects the quality of clinical decision-making and adherence to best practices, which are crucial for providing effective and safe patient care. It helps ensure that antibiotics are prescribed appropriately, reducing the risk of resistance and other complications.
* Percent of patients rating care as "satisfactory" or "highly satisfactory" (A): This is a patient satisfaction measure, which is important but not a direct measure of clinical care effectiveness.
* Raw number of influenza vaccines given (B): This is a volume measure, which does not directly reflect the quality of clinical care.
* Average wait time between check-in and seeing a provider (D): This is a measure of efficiency, not necessarily of clinical care effectiveness.
References
* NAHQ Body of Knowledge: Process and Outcome Measures in Quality Management
* NAHQ CPHQ Exam Preparation Materials: Evaluating Clinical Care Quality
=========

The teach-back method is an evidence-based communication strategy used to confirm patient understanding of care instructions. By asking patients to repeat the information in their own words, healthcare providers can ensure that patients comprehend their discharge instructions, which is crucial for safe transitions from hospital to home. Establishing the first follow-up appointment before discharge further reinforces continuity of care and provides patients with a clear plan for ongoing management.
Providing written information and reminder cards (Option B) supports patient recall but does not verify understanding. Sending information to the patient's physician and advising the patient to return to the emergency department for concerns (Option C) lacks proactive patient engagement and may lead to unnecessary emergency visits. Completing a discharge checklist and assigning a transitions navigator (Option D) are beneficial practices but may not be as immediately effective as the teach-back method in ensuring patient comprehension at discharge.
References:
* NAHQ's Professional Development Guide highlights the importance of effective communication strategies, such as the teach-back method, in promoting patient safety during care transitions.
nahq.org

Brainstorming in the initial phase of problem-solving encourages open idea generation to explore possibilities without judgment, setting the stage for collaborative solutions.
Option A (Fosters discussion of ideas): Discussion occurs during brainstorming, but it is a byproduct, not the primary benefit, which is inclusive input.
Option B (Defines problem-solving roles and responsibilities): Roles are defined in team formation, not brainstorming.
Option C (Allows input from all team members): This is the correct answer. The NAHQ CPHQ study guide states, "The primary benefit of initial brainstorming is to allow input from all team members, ensuring diverse perspectives and inclusive idea generation" (Domain 4). This promotes creativity and engagement.
Option D (Focuses on identifying the best solutions): Initial brainstorming generates ideas, not evaluates or selects solutions, which occurs later.
CPHQ Objective Reference: Domain 4: Performance and Process Improvement, Objective 4.2, "Use collaborative techniques for problem-solving," includes brainstorming for inclusive input. The NAHQ study guide notes, "Brainstorming ensures all team members contribute ideas, enhancing solution development" (Domain 4).
Rationale: Allowing all team members to contribute fosters inclusivity and creativity, the primary benefit of initial brainstorming, as per CPHQ's improvement principles.
Reference: NAHQ CPHQ Study Guide, Domain 4: Performance and Process Improvement, Objective 4.2.

Based on the provided Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey results, it's clear that the health plan's performance in several categories is below the Quality Compass Mean. This indicates potential areas for improvement in how services are perceived by members relative to other benchmarks.
Option D, "Solicit input from the member advocacy panel regarding barriers to service," directly targets understanding and addressing the lower satisfaction scores related to the ease of getting necessary care and overall satisfaction with the health plan. Engaging with a member advocacy panel could provide valuable qualitative insights into why members feel the way they do about the services provided, guiding more effective interventions.