Social determinants of health (SDOH) are non-medical factors like housing, education, and social support that influence health outcomes. A wellness program should consider SDOH that impact health behaviors and access.
Option A (How often patients have moved in the last year): Mobility may affect continuity but is less directly tied to wellness program design compared to social support structures.
Option B (Average age of individuals in the community): Age is a demographic factor, not a primary SDOH, though it may inform program focus.
Option C (Types of patients' health insurance): Insurance affects access to care but is a secondary SDOH compared to social or environmental factors.
Option D (Percent of families with multigenerational households): This is the correct answer. The NAHQ CPHQ study guide states, "Social determinants like family structure, including multigenerational households, impact health by influencing support systems and resource access" (Domain 5). Multigenerational households may affect caregiving and wellness participation.
CPHQ Objective Reference: Domain 5: Population Health and Care Transitions, Objective 5.4, "Incorporate SDOH into health programs," emphasizes social factors like family structure. The NAHQ study guide notes,
"SDOH such as household composition are critical for tailoring wellness programs" (Domain 5).
Rationale: Multigenerational households directly influence health behaviors, making them a key SDOH for wellness program design, as per CPHQ's population health principles.
Reference: NAHQ CPHQ Study Guide, Domain 5: Population Health and Care Transitions, Objective 5.4.

The first step in providing performance improvement training to supervisors is to assess their current knowledge. Understanding the existing knowledge level allows the healthcare quality professional to tailor the training content to address gaps, reinforce existing knowledge, and ensure that the training is relevant to the audience's needs. Without this initial assessment, there is a risk that the training might be too basic or too advanced, leading to ineffective learning outcomes.
Develop the content outline (B): While important, developing the content outline should come after assessing the supervisors' current knowledge to ensure the training is appropriately targeted. Assess the past performance of the group (C): Assessing past performance can be helpful, but it is secondary to understanding current knowledge, as the latter directly informs the content and structure of the training.
Provide a pretraining reading list (D): This is a preparatory step that would be more effective after determining what knowledge needs to be covered during the training. Reference NAHQ Body of Knowledge: Education and Training in Quality Improvement NAHQ CPHQ Exam Preparation Materials: Training Program Development and Implementation

To address complaints about the inefficiency of the registration process, it is crucial to accurately identify patient expectations, perceptions, and potential areas for improvement. Here's a step-by-step rationale for why a focus group with patients is the best option:
* Understanding Customer Expectations and Perceptions:
* Focus groups allow for in-depth discussions where patients can express their experiences, expectations, and perceptions in a more detailed and nuanced manner than surveys.
* This method encourages dialogue, enabling the facilitator to probe deeper into issues that patients might not think to mention in a survey.
* Interactive Feedback and Clarification:
* Unlikesurveys, which are typically more rigid and can limit the depth of feedback, focus groups provide a platform where participants can clarify their thoughts, build on others' comments, and discuss their ideas interactively.
* This interaction helps to uncover insights into patient frustrations, misunderstandings, and areas that might need improvement in the registration process.
* Opportunity Identification:
* Focus groups are excellent for identifying actionable improvement opportunities as they reveal not only what the issues are but also why they are problematic from the patients' perspectives.
* Through facilitated discussions, common themes and specific suggestions for improvements can emerge, which might not be captured in more quantitative approaches like surveys.
* Comparison with Other Methods:
* Telephone Surveys: While they can reach a broad audience, they may not capture the depth of feedback necessary to truly understand patient expectations and perceptions.
* Written Surveys: These can collect a large amount of data, but often lack the richness of qualitative data needed to identify nuanced patient experiences and improvement opportunities.
* Interviews with Registration Staff: While important for understanding internal perspectives, they do not directly capture the patient's voice, which is essential for customer-centered improvements.
In summary, the focus group method is best suited to gain deep insights into customer expectations, perceptions, and to identify specific areas for improvement in the registration process due to its interactive and exploratory nature.
References:
NAHQ Healthcare Quality Competency Framework: Customer Expectations and Patient Engagement NAHQ Guide to Performance and Process Improvement in Healthcare
=========