The P Chart of Hand Hygiene: Compliance before Pt. Contact is divided into Report Time A and Report Time B. The chart plots proportion on the Y-axis ranging from 0.3 to 1, and dates from 2019 January to 2020 November on the X-axis. There are three horizontal lines indicating UCL = 0.9677, P = 0.7517, and LCL =
0.9677. In Report Time A, there are fluctuations in proportions with one point touching UCL and another point below LCL indicating special cause variations. In Report Time B, all data points are between UCL and LCL with less fluctuation compared to Report Time A. The red line indicates tests performed with unequal sample sizes.
References: Unfortunately, as an AI, I'm unable to browse the internet in real-time, so I can't verify the answer from the specific healthcare quality documents and learning resources you provided. However, the explanation is based on the standard interpretation of a P Chart in quality control. For more detailed information, please refer to the provided resources.

The chart you've provided is a P chart, which is used to measure the proportion of nonconformities in a process over time, in this case, hand hygiene compliance before patient contact. This type of control chart is particularly useful for analyzing the performance of processes in areas like healthcare compliance.
From the visual analysis of the chart:
Upper Control Limit (UCL) and Lower Control Limit (LCL) are clearly labeled and appear consistent across both Report Time A and B at 0.9677. This addresses option A, indicating that the lower control limits remain unchanged between the two reporting periods.
Central Line (P), which represents the average proportion across the data set, is also consistent across both periods at 0.7517.
Outliers and Special Cause Variations would typically be indicated by points falling outside the control limits or showing non-random patterns that suggest shifts or trends.

Improving compliance with a corrective action plan requires identifying why the plan is not being followed, which involves analyzing root causes of non-compliance.
Option A (Determine areas of non-compliance through a root cause analysis): This is the correct answer. The NAHQ CPHQ study guide states, "Root cause analysis (RCA) is used to identify underlying reasons for non- compliance with action plans, enabling targeted interventions to improve adherence" (Domain 1). RCA helps pinpoint barriers like training gaps or process issues.
Option B (Determine if the action plan is in compliance with the national standards): Verifying standards is important but does not address current non-compliance issues.
Option C (Provide an analysis for the Patient Safety Committee): Analysis for a committee is a later step after identifying causes of non-compliance.
Option D (Provide disciplinary action to non-compliant departments): Disciplinary action is punitive and undermines a safety culture, not a QI approach.
CPHQ Objective Reference: Domain 1: Patient Safety, Objective 1.5, "Use root cause analysis to address compliance issues," emphasizes RCA for non-compliance. The NAHQ study guide notes, "RCA is a key tool for improving adherence to corrective action plans" (Domain 1).
Rationale: RCA identifies barriers to compliance, enabling effective solutions, as per CPHQ's patient safety principles.
Reference: NAHQ CPHQ Study Guide, Domain 1: Patient Safety, Objective 1.5.

The best measurement to document improvement in the process of addressing delays in diagnostic test result availability is turnaround time. Turnaround time measures the total time from when a diagnostic test is ordered to when the results are available to the ordering provider. This directly reflects the efficiency of the process and the impact of any improvements made to reduce delays.
Lost specimen rate (A): This measures a different aspect of the process (specimen handling), not the speed of result availability.
Average length of stay (C): This is a broader measure that may be influenced by many factors beyond diagnostic test turnaround time.
Provider satisfaction (D): While important, it is a subjective measure and may not directly reflect process efficiency improvements.
References
NAHQ Body of Knowledge: Measuring and Improving Turnaround Time in Healthcare Processes NAHQ CPHQ Exam Preparation Materials: Metrics for Process Improvement
=========