* Accountability for quality ultimately rests with the governing body of a health care organization, such as the board of directors or trustees. The governing body is responsible for setting the vision, mission, values, and strategic goals of the organization, as well as overseeing its performance, compliance, and risk management. The governing body also appoints, evaluates, and supports the CEO, who is accountable to the governing body for implementing the organization's strategy and ensuring quality and safety throughout the organization.
* The quality manager, the CEO, and the department leader are all important roles in ensuring quality within their respective scopes of authority and responsibility, but they are not the ultimate source of accountability for quality. The quality manager is responsible for designing, coordinating, and evaluating quality improvement initiatives, as well as providing education, training, and support to staff and leaders on quality methods and tools. The CEO is responsible for providing leadership, direction, and oversight to the organization's operations, finances, and culture, as well as ensuring alignment and integration of quality across all functions and levels. The department leader is responsible for managing the daily activities, resources, and performance of a specific unit or service, as well as ensuring compliance with quality standards and policies within their area of responsibility.
* However, none of these roles can ensure quality without the support, guidance, and accountability of the governing body, which has the ultimate authority and responsibility for the organization's quality and safety. The governing body sets the tone and expectations for quality at the top, and holds the CEO and other leaders accountable for delivering quality outcomes and improving quality processes. The governing body also monitors and evaluates the organization's quality performance and improvement efforts, and ensures that the organization has the necessary resources, structures, and systems to support quality. The governing body also ensures that the organization engages with external stakeholders, such as regulators, accreditors, payers, and patients, to demonstrate its commitment and accountability for quality.
References:
* NAHQ Code of Ethics, Principle 1: The healthcare quality professional acts as a change agent and leader within the organization and community, promoting a culture of excellence in quality, safety, and performance outcomes.
* NAHQ Learning Lab: The Role of the Healthcare Quality Professional in Population Health Management, Module 1: Introduction to Population Health Management, Slide 9: The Role of the Governing Body
* NAHQ Journal for Healthcare Quality, Volume 41, Issue 2, March/April 2019, Article: The Role of the Board in Quality and Safety Performance: Perceptions of Board Members and Quality Leaders, Page
72: Abstract and Page 77: Discussion

Explanation: A healthcare quality professional's key responsibility in quality governance is updating board members on key performance indicators (KPIs) (B), such as infection rates or patient satisfaction, to support data-driven oversight. Assessing board understanding (A),presenting financial updates (C), or deciding priorities (D) are not primary roles. NAHQ prioritizes KPI reporting for governance.
NAHQ CPHQ Study Guide, Organizational Leadership Section, "Quality Governance and Board Reporting"; NAHQ Code of Practice, Principle 3: Information Management.

The Quality Council typically comprises multidisciplinary members, including medical staff and quality professionals, who collaborate to develop and monitor quality indicators. This collaborative approach ensures that indicators are clinically relevant and aligned with organizational goals.
Reference:National Association for Healthcare Quality (NAHQ)

When it is discovered that labeled cutting boards, which were introduced to decrease cross-contamination, are not being used, the next logical step is to determine barriers to compliance. This step is crucial for the following reasons:
* Identifying the Root Cause: Before taking any corrective actions, it is important to understand why staff members are not using the labeled cutting boards. Barriers might include a lack of awareness, inadequate training, inconvenience, or resistance to change.
* Addressing the Correct Issue: Without identifying the barriers, any action taken may not be effective.
For instance, increasing monitoring or initiating discipline without understanding why the new process is not being followed could lead to frustration and further non-compliance.
* Facilitating Improvement: Once the barriers are identified, targeted interventions can be developed.
This might include additional training, revising the process for ease of use, or addressing any misconceptions about the importance of the change.
* Ensuring Sustainability: By resolving the underlying issues that prevent compliance, the organization can ensure that the process improvement is sustained over time, leading to better outcomes.
References: (Based on Healthcare Quality NAHQ documents and resources)
* NAHQ CPHQ Study Guide, Section on Change Management and Compliance.
* Quality Management in Health Care, Article on Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Compliance.
=========