Section: Volume A
Explanation:
Risk communication is the process of exchanging information and views about risks among stakeholders, such as groups, individuals, and institutions. Risk communication is mostly concerned with the nature of risk or expressing concerns, views, or reactions to risk managers or institutional bodies for risk management. The key plan to consider and communicate risk is to categorize and impose priorities, and acquire suitable measures to reduce risks. It is important throughout any crisis to put across multifaceted information in a simple and clear manner.
Risk communication helps in switching or allocating the information concerning risk among the decision-maker and the stakeholders. Risk communication can be explained more clearly with the help of the following definitions:
* It defines the issue of what a group does, not just what it says.
* It must take into account the valuable element in user's perceptions of risk.
* It will be more valuable if it is thought of as conversation, not instruction.
Risk communication is a fundamental and continuing element of the risk analysis exercise, and the involvement of the stakeholder group is from the beginning. It makes the stakeholders conscious of the process at each phase of the risk assessment. It helps to guarantee that the restrictions, outcomes, consequence, logic, and risk assessment are undoubtedly understood by all the stakeholders.
Incorrect Answers:
C: A risk response ensures that the residual risk is within the limits of the risk appetite and tolerance of the enterprise. Risk response is process of selecting the correct, prioritized response to risk, based on the level of risk, the enterprise's risk tolerance and the cost and benefit of the particular risk response option.
Risk response ensures that management is providing accurate reports on:
* The level of risk faced by the enterprise
* The incidents' type that have occurred
* Any alteration in the enterprise's risk profile based on changes in the risk environment

Effective risk communication best benefits an organization by helping personnel make better-informed decisions. Risk communication is the process of exchanging information and opinions among stakeholders about the nature, magnitude, significance, or control of a risk. By communicating risk information clearly and consistently, the organization can enhance the understanding and awareness of the risk, and enable the personnel to make decisions that are aligned with the risk appetite and objectives of the organization. Assisting the development of a risk register, improving the effectiveness of IT controls, and increasing participation in the risk assessment process are other possible benefits, but they are not as important as helping personnel make better-informed decisions. References = ISACA Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control (CRISC) Certification Exam Question and Answers, question 12; CRISC Review Manual, 6th Edition, page
215.

Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
There is an increased risk without a policy defining who has the responsibility for granting access to specific data or systems, as one could gain system access without a justified business needs. There is better chance that business objectives will be properly supported when there is appropriate ownership.
Incorrect Answers:
A, B, D: These risks are not such significant as compared to unauthorized access.

An IT risk register is a document that records and tracks the IT-related risks that an organization faces, as well as the information and actions related to those risks, such as the risk description, assessment, response, status, and owner. An IT risk register is a valuable tool for managing and communicating IT risks and their impact on the organization's objectives and operations. However, an IT risk register may also contain sensitive or confidential information that should not be disclosed or shared with unauthorized or irrelevant parties, as it may compromise the security, privacy, or reputation of the organization or its stakeholders. Therefore, the risk manager's best approach to the request from the head of a business operations department to review the entire IT risk register is to determine the purpose of the request before sharing the register. This is a technique to understand and evaluate the reason and the need for the request, as well as the scope and the level of access that the requester requires or expects. By determining the purpose of the request, the risk manager can ensure that the request is legitimate, appropriate, and relevant, and that the requester has a clear and valid interest or stake in the IT risk register. The risk manager can also ensure that the request is aligned with the organization's policies, procedures, and standards for IT risk management and information sharing. The risk manager can also use the purpose of the request to decide what and how much information to share with the requester, and what conditions or restrictions to apply, such as confidentiality, accuracy, or timeliness. The other options are not the best approaches to the request from the head of a business operations department to review the entire IT risk register, as they may be premature, unnecessary, or ineffective. Escalating to senior management is a technique to involve or inform the higher-level authorities or decision makers about the request, which may be useful or required in some cases, but it may not be the first or the best step to take, as it may delay or complicate the process, or undermine the risk manager's authority or responsibility. Requiring a nondisclosure agreement is a technique to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the information in the IT risk register by legally binding the requester to not disclose or misuse the information. However, a nondisclosure agreement may not be needed or appropriate in every case, and it may not prevent or address other issues or risks related to the information sharing, such as relevance, accuracy, or timeliness. Sanitizing portions of the register is a technique to remove or redact the sensitive or confidential information from the IT risk register before sharing it with the requester, which may be necessary or prudent in some cases, but it may not be sufficient or satisfactory, as it may affect the completeness, usefulness, or validity of the information, or raise questions or concerns from the requester.