The risk register does not examine the network diagram and the critical path. There may be risks associated with the activities on the network diagram, but it does not address the network diagram directly. The risk register is updated at the end of the plan risk response process with the information that was discovered during the process. The response plans are recorded in the risk register. In the risk register, risk is stated in order of priority, i.e., those with the highest potential for threat or opportunity first. Some risks might not require response plans at all, but then too they should be put on a watch list and monitored throughout the project. Following elements should appear in the risk register: List of identified risks, including their descriptions, root causes, and how the risks impact the project objectives Risk owners and their responsibility Outputs from the Perform Qualitative Analysis process Agreed-upon response strategies Risk triggers Cost and schedule activities needed to implement risk responses Contingency plans Fallback plans, which are risk response plans that are executed when the initial risk response plan proves to be ineffective Contingency reserves Residual risk, which is a leftover risk that remains after the risk response strategy has been implemented Secondary risks, which are risks that come about as a result of implementing a risk response

Section: Volume D
Explanation/Reference: https://www.casact.org/education/infocus/2014/handouts/Paper_3464_handout_2190_0.pdf

Restricting access to the risk register on a need-to-know basis is important because it contains vulnerabilities and threats that could expose the organization to potential harm or loss if they are disclosed or exploited by unauthorized parties. The risk register is a tool that captures and documents the risk identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment processes1. The risk register contains sensitive information such as the sources and causes of risk, the potential impacts and consequences of risk, the likelihood and frequency of risk occurrence, and the risk response actions and plans1. If this information is accessed by unauthorized parties, such as competitors, hackers, or malicious insiders, they could use it to launch attacks, sabotage operations, or gain an unfair advantage over the organization. Therefore, access to the risk register should be limited to those who have a legitimate need and authorization to view, modify, or use the information, such as the risk owners, managers, or practitioners

A cloud access security broker (CASB) solution is the best way to enforce access control for an organization that uses multiple cloud technologies, as it provides a centralized and consistent platform to manage and monitor the access to various cloud services and applications. A CASB solution can help to implement and enforce the enterprise's access policies and standards, as well as to detect and prevent unauthorized or malicious access attempts. Senior management support of cloud adoption strategies, creation of a cloud access risk management policy, and expansion of security information and event management (SIEM) to cloud services are not the best ways to enforce access control for an organization that uses multiple cloud technologies, as they do not provide the technical capabilities or tools to manage and monitor the access to various cloud services and applications. References = CRISC by Isaca Actual Free Exam Q&As, question
210; CRISC: Certified in Risk & Information Systems Control Sample Questions, question 210.