Explanation
https://docs.databricks.com/delta-live-tables/expectations.html
Delta Live Tables is a tool provided by Databricks that can help data engineers automate the monitoring of data quality. It is designed for managing data pipelines, monitoring data quality, and automating workflows.
With Delta Live Tables, you can set up data quality checks and alerts to detect issues and anomalies in your data as it is ingested and processed in real-time. It provides a way to ensure that the data quality meets your desired standards and can trigger actions or notifications when issues are detected. While the other tools mentioned may have their own purposes in a data engineeringenvironment, Delta Live Tables is specifically designed for data quality monitoring and automation within the Databricks ecosystem.

The Tasks tab in the Jobs UI shows the list of tasks that are part of a job, and allows the user to view the details of each task, such as the notebook path, the cluster configuration, the run status, and the duration. By clicking on the active run of a task, the user can access the Spark UI, the notebook output, and the logs of the task. These can help the user to identify the performance bottlenecks and errors in the task. The Runs tab in the Jobs UI only shows the summary of the job runs, such as the start time, the end time, the trigger, and the status. It does not provide the details of the individual tasks within a job run. References: Jobs UI, Monitor running jobs with a Job Run dashboard, How to optimize jobs performance

The expected behavior when a batch of data containing data that violates the expectation is processed is that the job will fail. This is because the expectation clause has the ON VIOLATION FAIL UPDATE option, which means that if any record in the batch does not meet the expectation, the entire batch will be rejected and the job will fail. This option is useful for enforcing strict data quality rules and preventing invalid data from entering the target dataset.
Option A is not correct, as the ON VIOLATION FAIL UPDATE option does not drop the records that violate the expectation, but fails the entire batch. To drop the records that violate the expectation and record them as invalid in the event log, the ON VIOLATION DROP RECORD option should be used.
Option C is not correct, as the ON VIOLATION FAIL UPDATE option does not drop the records that violate the expectation, but fails the entire batch. To drop the records that violate the expectation and load them into a quarantine table, the ON VIOLATION QUARANTINE RECORD option should be used.
Option D is not correct, as the ON VIOLATION FAIL UPDATE option does not add the records that violate the expectation, but fails the entire batch. To add the records that violate the expectation and record them as invalid in the event log, the ON VIOLATION LOG RECORD option should be used.
Option E is not correct, as the ON VIOLATION FAIL UPDATE option does not add the records that violate the expectation, but fails the entire batch. To add the records that violate the expectation and flag them as invalid in a field added to the target dataset, the ON VIOLATION FLAG RECORD option should be used.
Reference:
Delta Live Tables Expectations
[Databricks Data Engineer Professional Exam Guide]

The Auto Stop feature allows the SQL endpoint to automatically stop after a specified period of inactivity. This can help reduce the cost and resource consumption of the SQL endpoint, as it will only run when it is needed to refresh the dashboard or execute queries. The data engineer can configure the Auto Stop setting for the SQL endpoint from the SQL Endpoints UI, by selecting the desired idle time from the Auto Stop dropdown menu. The default idle time is 120 minutes, but it can be set to as low as 15 minutes or as high as 240 minutes. Alternatively, the data engineer can also use the SQL Endpoints REST API to set the Auto Stop setting programmatically. Reference: SQL Endpoints UI, SQL Endpoints REST API, Refreshing SQL Dashboard

Explanation
In some data processing pipelines, especially those following a typical "Bronze-Silver-Gold" data lakehouse architecture, Silver tables are often considered a more refined version of the raw or Bronze data. Silver tables may include data cleansing, schema enforcement, and some initial transformations. Gold tables, on the other hand, typically represent a stage where data is further enriched, aggregated, and processed to provide valuable insights for analytical purposes. This could indeed involve more aggregations compared to Silver tables.