The Huawei Intelligent Video Surveillance (IVS) platform is designed with a high degree of openness and compatibility, allowing it to manage a vast array of front-end devices from various third-party vendors. To facilitate this interoperability, the platform utilizes a specialized driver or plug-in architecture. While standard protocols like ONVIF, GB/T 28181, and SDKs provide a baseline for communication, many proprietary features and vendor-specific protocols require a dedicated access plug-in to be installed on the platform side.
These plug-ins act as a translation layer that maps the third-party camera's private commands and data structures to the IVS platform's unified internal management language. This is particularly important for synchronization functions and interconnection collection, which are often handled by the VDS (Video Data Service) component. By installing the correct vendor-specific plug-in, the platform can access advanced camera features such as PTZ control, alarm reporting, and parameter configuration that might not be fully supported by generic standards. This modular approach allows Huawei's intelligent vision system to remain flexible and future-proof, enabling rapid integration of new camera models and vendors without requiring a full system-wide firmware upgrade.

The correct answer is D because the statement itself is inconsistent with the standard IVS3800 plane naming logic. In IVS deployment, network design is performed per network plane , and the material distinguishes service and management connectivity, for example by referencing service TOR and management TOR , and by using terms such as external service IP address and external management floating IP address for upper-layer connection planning . This clearly supports standard plane naming such as Outer_Service , Inner_Service , and Outer_OM .
The option D uses "InnerJDM" , which does not match the naming pattern established by the rest of the network design terminology. In professional IVS planning, this is most likely a typographical corruption of Inner_OM . Since the question asks which statement is false, the incorrect plane name makes D the false statement as written. The other options are structurally consistent with IVS network-plane design principles, where core predefined service and OM address ranges are typically kept unchanged to avoid deployment and expansion issues. Therefore, D is the false statement.