When a security policy is deleted, the existing sessions that were previously allowed by that policy are not immediately dropped; instead, they are typically treated as legacy flows. This means they are allowed to continue until they naturally end or until the session timeout is reached. This behavior ensures that deleting a policy does not abruptly disrupt ongoing traffic flows that were previously authorized by that policy. This approach helps in avoiding unintended service disruptions, especially in production environments where active connections may be critical to operations.

The correct answers are B and D. The command output is from the SRX Series device: show services user- identification identity-management status. Under Primary server, the exhibit shows Address: 192.168.1.10, Port: 443, Connection method: HTTPS, and Connection status: Online. In Juniper Identity Management Service integration, the SRX is the client that connects to the configured primary JIMS server. Juniper's configuration workflow specifically describes configuring "the IP address of the primary JIMS server" under services user-identification identity-management connection primary address, and the verification output shows that primary server address with its connection status.
Option A is wrong because 192.168.1.10 is listed under Primary server, not as the local SRX address. Option C is also wrong because this SRX command verifies the SRX-to-JIMS identity-management connection, not the backend JIMS-to-domain-controller connection. Domain controller reachability would be validated from JIMS or through JIMS-specific status/monitoring, not by this SRX-side output. The displayed Online state and OK (200) status confirm that the SRX successfully reached the JIMS HTTPS service and received a valid response. Juniper examples use the same status command to validate that the SRX identity-management connection to JIMS is online.
Reference topics: Identity-Aware Security Policies, Juniper Identity Management Service, SRX-to-JIMS connectivity, identity-management status verification.

A single vSRX instance is capable of handling both firewall and NAT services simultaneously. This solution provides a streamlined and resource-efficient way to secure and manage network traffic within a private cloud environment.
Similar to the vSRX, a single cSRX can also provide both firewall and NAT services. The cSRX, being a containerized version of the SRX, is particularly suited for environments where high density and microservices architectures are used, offering high performance in a compact form factor.

The correct answers are B and D. A terminal rule is specifically designed to stop further rule evaluation.
Juniper states that the IDP rule-matching algorithm normally checks traffic against all matching rules in the rulebase, but when a terminal rule matches the source, destination, zones, and application, IDP does not continue to check subsequent rules for that same traffic. Juniper also warns that traffic matching a terminal rule is not compared to later rules even if it does not match the attack object inside that terminal rule.
Option D is also correct because the Ignore Connection action stops scanning traffic for the rest of the connection if an attack match is found. Juniper defines Ignore Connection as disabling the rulebase for that specific connection after a match. Option A is wrong because a close action closes the connection by sending reset behavior, but it is not the rule-processing control mechanism being tested. Option C is a trap: the exempt rulebase is used to suppress known false positives after an IPS rule match, but the two direct mechanisms that end IDP rule processing are terminal rule matching and ignore connection. Reference topics: IDP rulebases, terminal rules, Ignore Connection action, rule-matching algorithm, false-positive exemption.

The correct answer is B. ip-notify. When administrators want visibility without enforcement impact, ip-notify is the correct IP action. Juniper Security Director documentation defines IP Notify as an IP action that does not take any action against future traffic but logs the event. That is exactly the requirement in the question:
traffic matching the IDP condition must not be blocked, closed, or rate-limited until administrators have reviewed the events and decided whether enforcement is appropriate.
Option A, ip-block, is wrong because it blocks future packets matching the IP action rule. That would immediately impact traffic. Option C, ip-connection-rate-limit, is wrong because it limits the connection rate and therefore changes traffic behavior before administrators complete evaluation. Option D, ip-close, is also wrong because it closes matching future sessions by sending reset packets to the client and server, which is disruptive. In a safe evaluation or tuning phase, the proper approach is to log and observe first, then move to stronger actions such as block, close, or rate-limit only after the detected condition has been validated.
Reference topics: IDP IP actions, ip-notify, event logging, non-disruptive evaluation mode, IDP policy tuning.