Option A:
this.growl = () => { ... } inside the constructor creates a new function per instance.
For 1000 new Monster(), you get 1000 distinct growl functions, each stored on the instance itself.
Option B:
Monster.prototype.growl = () => { ... } attaches growl to the prototype.
All instances share the same single growl function via the prototype chain.
For 1000 instances, only 1 growl method exists in memory.
So: Option A → 1000; Option B → 1.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract JavaScript Knowledge:
Expression:
true + '13' + NaN
The + operator is left-associative, so evaluation order:
true + '13'
When one operand is a string, + performs string concatenation.
true is converted to string 'true'.
'true' + '13' → 'true13'.
Result from step 1 with NaN:
'true13' + NaN
Again, one operand is a string, so concatenation.
NaN is converted to string 'NaN'.
'true13' + 'NaN' → 'true13NaN'.
Final value: 'true13NaN'.
So A is correct.
Why others are wrong:
B: '113NaN' would require true to coerce to 1 first and no string to be present, which is not the case because '13' forces string concatenation.
C: 14 would require pure numeric addition, which is not the case once a string is involved.
D: 'true13' ignores the final + NaN part.
Concepts: type coercion with +, boolean to string, NaN to string, left-associative evaluation.
________________________________________

objA is { value: 10 }.
objB = objA; → both variables reference the same object.
changeValue(objB);:
obj.value = obj.value / 2; // modifies the shared object
So:
objA.value becomes 10 / 2 = 5.
Thus result is 5.

The correct answer is D.
Semantic versioning usually follows this format:
MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
For the version:
1.1.3
The parts are:
1 = MAJOR
1 = MINOR
3 = PATCH
A package version should be updated based on the type of change:
MAJOR version changes when there are breaking changes.
MINOR version changes when new features are added in a backward-compatible way.
PATCH version changes when backward-compatible bug fixes are added.
The question says the developer added new features that do not break backward compatibility. That means the minor version should increase.
Starting version:
1.1.3
Increase the minor version from 1 to 2, and reset the patch version to 0:
1.2.0
Why the other options are incorrect:
A . 1.2.3 is incorrect because when the minor version increases, the patch version should reset to 0.
B . 1.1.4 is incorrect because that would represent a patch update, usually for bug fixes, not new features.
C . 2.0.0 is incorrect because that would represent a major version update, usually for breaking changes.
D . 1.2.0 is correct because it represents a backward-compatible feature release.
Therefore, the verified answe r is D.