This situation represents a Threat within SWOT analysis. SWOT distinguishes between internal and external factors. Strengths and weaknesses are internal to the organisation, while opportunities and threats are external.
Here, the short-term spike in demand is external to Callie's business. It is also potentially harmful because increased competition for raw materials [rubber, metal, etc.] can lead to higher prices, longer lead times, and supply shortages. Therefore, this is categorised as a threat.
It cannot be an opportunity, as the increase in demand benefits suppliers rather than Callie's firm. Nor is it a strength or weakness, as those describe factors within the company such as production capabilities or financial resources.
Using SWOT in category management allows managers to anticipate and mitigate external risks while leveraging internal strengths. Recognising this threat means Callie may develop strategies such as dual sourcing, supplier collaboration, or forward buying to reduce exposure.
[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.122 - SWOT analysis in category management]

In construction, indirect costs include items like workshops, safety facilities, and design engineers. These are necessary for operations but not directly tied to a single output.
[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.90 - Indirect cost examples by industry]

Category Management is a strategic approach to procurement. According to CIPS, it is defined as "a rigorous fact-based, end-to-end process for proactively collaborating with stakeholders to develop and implement sourcing strategies that deliver significant value from an organisation's external spend." Unlike tactical or reactive procurement, which focuses on immediate needs or firefighting, category management emphasises long-term planning, data analysis, supplier relationships, and alignment with business objectives. It goes beyond simply planning purchases in advance [which could apply to "planned procurement"] by integrating market intelligence, risk assessment, and value optimisation.
Being strategic means that category management seeks not only cost savings but also innovation, sustainability, and resilience. It requires cross-functional collaboration and the use of analytical tools like Kraljic matrices, total cost of ownership, and supplier segmentation.
Therefore, the most accurate categorisation is strategic procurement, not merely tactical or planned.
[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.2 - Category Management as a strategic approach]

In category management, grouping is most effective when based on similar usage characteristics. This means materials or services are categorised by how they are used within the organisation, rather than simply by spend or supplier. For example, in healthcare, personal protective equipment (PPE) forms one category, while surgical instruments or bedding may be separate categories. This approach ensures that category managers have a clear understanding of functional requirements, demand patterns, and value drivers.
Grouping only by spend might overlook strategic importance, while grouping by supplier or geography can miss opportunities for cross-functional efficiencies. Usage-based categorisation allows for tailored procurement strategies that align with business objectives and ensure effective stakeholder engagement. It also enables organisations to identify synergies across business units and improve supplier management. By aligning categories to organisational needs rather than just financial or structural dimensions, procurement creates more value and achieves better alignment with corporate strategy.
Reference: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.48

The International Association for ContractCommercial Management [IACCM], now known as WorldCC, provides frameworks to help organisations select the most suitable sourcing and contracting models. For category managers, this is particularly valuable when deciding whether a transactional, relational, or investment-based model best fits the organisation's needs.
It does not directly choose suppliers or perform market analysis; rather, it guides decision-makers on the structural relationship with suppliers. For example, IACCM provides tools to decide whether to adopt outcome-based contracts, performance partnerships, or traditional transactional agreements.
Benchmarking may be a separate exercise, but sourcing models determine the governance and risk-sharing approach that underpins supplier relationships.
CIPS encourages procurement professionals to be familiar with IACCM's role, as it reinforces the need for strategic selection of sourcing models rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.31 - IACCM and sourcing model selection]