See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Stakeholder Classification: Using Mendelow's Matrix
Stakeholders play a crucial role in the success of an organization, influencing decisions, resources, and operations. To effectively manage stakeholders, organizations need a model that helps classify and prioritize stakeholders based on their influence and interest. One widely used framework is Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix.
This essay describes Mendelow's Matrix, evaluates its effectiveness, and discusses its advantages and limitations.
Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix
Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix (1991) is a strategic tool that classifies stakeholders based on two key factors:
Power - The ability of a stakeholder to influence the organization's decision-making.
Interest - The level of concern a stakeholder has about the organization's activities.
Based on these factors, stakeholders are placed into one of four quadrants:
Stakeholder Group
Power
Interest
Management Strategy
Key Players
High
High
Actively engage and involve
Keep Satisfied
High
Low
Monitor closely, engage when necessary
Keep Informed
Low
High
Provide regular updates, listen to concerns
Minimal Effort
Low
Low
Monitor but minimal engagement
1. Key Players (High Power, High Interest)
These stakeholders have significant influence over the organization and strong interest in its operations.
Examples:
✔ Senior executives, major shareholders, government regulators.
✔ Large customers or strategic suppliers.
Management Strategy:
✔ Actively involve them in decision-making.
✔ Consult regularly and address their concerns immediately.
Evaluation:
✔ Managing this group well ensures strong support for company initiatives.
✘ Ignoring them can lead to significant resistance and business risks.
2. Keep Satisfied (High Power, Low Interest)
These stakeholders have high power but low interest, meaning they can affect the organization significantly if ignored.
Examples:
✔ Government bodies that enforce regulations but do not intervene unless necessary.
✔ Wealthy investors with minimal involvement in daily operations.
Management Strategy:
✔ Engage periodically to keep them satisfied.
✔ Provide updates on key decisions without overwhelming them.
Evaluation:
✔ Proper management prevents unexpected opposition.
✘ If engagement is too frequent, they may lose interest or disengage.
3. Keep Informed (Low Power, High Interest)
These stakeholders do not have direct power but are highly interested in the company's actions.
Examples:
✔ Employees, local communities, NGOs concerned about sustainability.
✔ Small-scale suppliers who depend on the company.
Management Strategy:
✔ Communicate regularly through reports, newsletters, or meetings.
✔ Listen to concerns and provide transparency.
Evaluation:
✔ Keeping them engaged builds positive public relations and internal morale.
✘ If ignored, they may escalate concerns to higher-power stakeholders.
4. Minimal Effort (Low Power, Low Interest)
These stakeholders have little influence and low interest, meaning they do not require significant attention.
Examples:
✔ General public who have no direct impact on the company.
✔ Non-core suppliers with small contracts.
Management Strategy:
✔ Monitor their concerns occasionally.
✔ Avoid unnecessary engagement unless their influence changes.
Evaluation:
✔ Avoiding excessive engagement saves time and resources.
✘ If their interest or power grows, they may require reclassification.
Evaluation of Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix
Advantages of the Model
✔ Simple and Practical - Easy to understand and apply in various industries.
✔ Helps Prioritize Stakeholders - Ensures critical stakeholders receive appropriate attention.
✔ Supports Strategic Decision-Making - Guides communication and engagement efforts.
✔ Adaptable - Can be used for mergers, change management, procurement, and public relations.
Limitations of the Model
✘ Does Not Capture Stakeholder Dynamics - Stakeholder power and interest change over time, requiring constant reassessment.
✘ Overlooks Stakeholder Relationships - Some stakeholders influence others (e.g., media can amplify employee concerns).
✘ Power and Interest Can Be Subjective - Classifying stakeholders requires judgment and regular review.
Conclusion
Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix is a powerful tool for classifying and managing stakeholders in any organization. By categorizing stakeholders based on power and interest, leaders can develop effective engagement strategies and mitigate risks associated with key stakeholders. However, stakeholder influence is fluid, so ongoing analysis is necessary for long-term success. Despite its limitations, this model remains a fundamental framework for strategic stakeholder management.

See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Intro - what is contingency theory?
Each factor in a paragraph: external environment, technology, size, culture, goals, leader style, the people Conclusion - there is no universally 'right' way to structure an organisation, and it can change over time.
Example Essay
The Contingency Model of organization is a management and organizational theory that suggests there is no one-size-fits-all approach to organizing and managing a company. Instead, it proposes that the most effective organizational structure and management style depend on various external and internal factors, often referred to as contingencies. The core idea behind this model is that the optimal way to organize and manage an organization is contingent upon the unique circumstances or contingencies it faces.
Key factors that should be considered in the Contingency Model of Organization include:
Environmental Factors: The external environment, including factors like the industry in which the organization operates, economic conditions, competition, and legal and regulatory requirements, can greatly influence the organization's structure and strategy. An organisation should consider STEEPLED factors and Porter's 5 Forces when deciding which company structure would be most appropriate.
Technology: The nature of the organization's technology and the rate of technological change can impact its structure and processes. Some organizations may need to be more flexible and adaptive due to rapidly changing technologies, while others may rely on stable and proven technologies. For example, does the organisational structure allow people to work remotely from home?
Organizational Size: The size of the organization can affect its structure and management practices. Smaller organizations might have a more informal structure, while larger ones may require more formal hierarchies. For example a small organisation would not benefit from a bureaucratic structure, but a large organisation may need several levels of management and a degree of bureaucracy.
Organizational Culture: The culture of the organization, including its values, norms, and beliefs, can influence how it is structured and managed. For instance, an innovative and entrepreneurial culture may lead to a flatter, more decentralized structure.
Goals and Strategy: The goals and strategy of the organization play a crucial role in determining its structure and management style. Different strategies, such as cost leadership, differentiation, or innovation, may require different organizational structures and approaches.
Leadership Style: The leadership style of top management can impact the organization's structure and culture. Leaders with a preference for centralization may create a more hierarchical structure, while those who favour decentralization may opt for a flatter structure.
Human Resources: The skills, abilities, and motivation of the workforce can influence how an organization is structured and managed. A highly skilled and motivated workforce may require less supervision and a more decentralized structure.
The important thing to note with the Contingency Theory is that the organization's needs and circumstances can change over time, so what works best today may not be suitable in the future. Organizations must continuously assess and adapt their structures and management practices as contingencies evolve.
In essence, the Contingency Model recognizes that there is no universally optimal way to organize and manage an organization. Instead, managers must carefully assess and consider the various contingencies that affect their organization and make decisions accordingly. This approach promotes flexibility and adaptability in organizational design and management, allowing companies to better respond to changing circumstances and maximize their effectiveness.
Tutor Notes
- Another way this could come up as a question is related to a case study. You may be asked to pick out factors which would effect the way an organisation is structured.
- You could also be asked pros and cons of the contingency theory (pro: very flexible, highly responsive to changes con: people don't know where they stand, harder to find accountability)
- It's covered in detail in the studyguide but it's quite a simple concept - the best structure for an organisation depends on lots of different factors.

See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Introduction
Leadership plays a pivotal role in organizational success, influencing decision-making, team performance, and strategic direction. One of the earliest and most enduring leadership theories is the "Traits Approach to Leadership." This theory suggests that certain inherent traits make an individual an effective leader. Unlike other leadership theories that focus on behaviors or situational factors, the traits approach assumes that leaders are born, not made.
This essay will critically evaluate the traits approach to leadership, discussing its key characteristics, advantages, limitations, and relevance in modern organizational contexts, particularly in procurement and supply chain management.
Understanding the Traits Approach to Leadership
Definition
The Traits Approach to Leadership is based on the idea that effective leaders possess inherent personality traits that differentiate them from non-leaders. These traits are considered stable over time and consistent across different situations.
Early leadership research focused on identifying the common traits found in successful leaders across industries, military settings, and politics.
Key Characteristics of the Traits Approach
Innate Leadership Qualities - Leadership is seen as something a person is born with, rather than developed.
Focus on Personality Traits - Effective leaders exhibit specific personality traits such as intelligence, confidence, and emotional stability.
Universal Application - The theory assumes that leadership traits apply across all industries and organizational settings.
Predictability of Leadership Success - If someone possesses the right traits, they are more likely to become a successful leader.
Common Leadership Traits Identified in Research

These traits suggest that leaders are naturally equipped with qualities that allow them to excel in their roles.
Advantages of the Traits Approach to Leadership (10 Points)
1. Identifies Key Leadership Qualities
The traits approach helps organizations identify individuals with leadership potential by assessing personality traits.
Example: In procurement, a leader with high intelligence and problem-solving skills can effectively negotiate supplier contracts and manage risks.
2. Provides a Foundation for Leadership Selection
Organizations can use personality assessments to select and promote leaders based on their inherent characteristics.
Example: A company hiring a Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) may look for candidates who exhibit confidence, strong decision-making skills, and integrity.
3. Universally Recognized and Researched
This approach has been extensively studied for decades, making it one of the most well-documented leadership theories.
Example: Many successful world leaders, such as Steve Jobs and Nelson Mandela, exhibited self-confidence, resilience, and intelligence-key traits identified in the model.
4. Helps Develop Leadership Training Programs
Although traits are largely inborn, some leadership traits can be developed through training and experience.
Example: An employee with high intelligence but low sociability can undergo communication and emotional intelligence training to become a more effective leader.
5. Supports Leadership Continuity and Succession Planning
Organizations can identify and groom future leaders by assessing leadership traits early in their careers.
Example: A procurement manager with initiative, strong ethics, and analytical skills can be promoted to a strategic leadership role.
Limitations of the Traits Approach to Leadership (10 Points)
1. Ignores the Influence of Situations and Context
Leadership effectiveness depends on the situation rather than just traits.
Example: A leader with strong confidence and intelligence may struggle in a highly bureaucratic organization where decision-making is slow.
2. Fails to Explain Leadership Development
This theory assumes that leaders are born, not made, which contradicts modern research showing that leadership can be learned and developed.
Example: Many successful CEOs started as entry-level employees and developed their leadership skills over time.
3. Overlooks the Importance of Leadership Behaviors
Having the right traits does not automatically make someone an effective leader-their actions, decision-making style, and adaptability matter more.
Example: A procurement leader with high intelligence but poor communication skills may fail to build strong supplier relationships.
4. No Clear Agreement on Essential Traits
Different studies identify different sets of leadership traits, making it difficult to define a universal leadership profile.
Example: Some researchers emphasize charisma and extroversion, while others focus on humility and adaptability.
5. Does Not Account for Cultural Differences
Leadership traits may not be universal across cultures-a trait that is valuable in one culture may not be as important in another.
Example: In Western cultures, assertiveness is valued, while in Asian cultures, humility and collective decision-making are preferred leadership traits.
Relevance of the Traits Approach in Modern Organizations
Despite its limitations, the traits approach remains relevant in leadership selection and development. Modern organizations integrate it with other leadership theories to create a holistic leadership model.
1. Integration with Behavioral Leadership Models
Instead of assuming that traits alone determine leadership success, organizations combine it with behavioral approaches that emphasize leadership actions.
Example: Transformational leadership combines traits (e.g., charisma, confidence) with inspiring behaviors to create an effective leadership model.
2. Use in Leadership Assessments and Hiring
Organizations use psychometric assessments to evaluate potential leaders based on personality traits.
Example: The Big Five Personality Model (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism) is commonly used in executive hiring.
3. Helps in Leadership Development Programs
While some leadership traits are inborn, others can be developed through mentorship, training, and experience.
Example: Procurement professionals can enhance their decision-making skills, emotional intelligence, and adaptability through leadership development programs.
Conclusion
The traits approach to leadership has been a foundational theory in leadership studies, helping organizations understand the qualities that define effective leaders. It provides valuable insights into leadership selection, succession planning, and training.
However, the approach has several limitations, particularly its lack of situational awareness and failure to explain leadership development. Modern organizations recognize that while leadership traits are important, behaviors, experience, and adaptability play an equally critical role.
The most effective approach to leadership combines trait theory with behavioral and situational leadership models to create a well-rounded leadership development framework. This ensures that leadership is not just about natural talent but also about continuous learning, adaptability, and strategic execution.

See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction- what is due diligence - assessing and evaluating suppliers.
Section 1 - how to do due diligence: risk assessments, supplier selection, audits, contracts, continuous processes, communication Section 1 - why - quality issues, risk to business continuity, ethical reasons, customer/ stakeholder requirements Conclusion: it's essential for Delicious Ltd (relate back to case study).
Example Essay
Supplier due diligence is a critical process for organizations like Delicious Ltd, which rely on complex international supply chains to source commodity items. Due diligence involves assessing and evaluating the performance, reliability, and ethical practices of suppliers to ensure they meet the company's standards and requirements.
Here's how supplier due diligence can be implemented:
Risk Assessment: Begin by identifying the potential risks within the supply chain. This may include geopolitical risks, natural disasters, economic instability, and even supplier-specific risks like production delays or quality issues. It should also look at ethical considerations such as the use of forced or child labour in the supply chain and the working conditions of those employed by suppliers.
Supplier Selection: Carefully select suppliers based on criteria such as their track record, reputation, financial stability, quality control processes, and ethical practices. Delicious Ltd should consider multiple sources for critical raw materials such as sugar and flour to diversify risk. This means if one supplier goes bust, or is unable to provide the required quantities, Delicious Ltd can source materials elsewhere. The Kraljic Matrix would be a useful tool here.
Audits and Inspections: Delicious Ltd can conduct regular audits and inspections of suppliers' facilities and practices to ensure they meet the company's standards. These audits can include quality checks, ethical compliance checks, and supply chain continuity assessments. They can use an independent 3rd party to do this.
Contractual Agreements: Delicious Ltd should define clear terms and conditions in supplier contracts, specifying quality requirements, delivery schedules, pricing structures, and dispute resolution mechanisms. These contracts should reflect the results of due diligence assessments.
Continuous Monitoring: Establish a system for ongoing monitoring of suppliers' performance. This includes regular communication, feedback mechanisms, and performance reviews to ensure suppliers maintain the desired standards. Delicious Ltd could use the Demming Plan Do Check Act cycle here.
Contingency Planning: Develop contingency plans for potential supply chain disruptions. This could involve identifying alternative suppliers or establishing safety stock levels for critical raw materials. For example, by holding a surplus stock of flour in it's own warehouse, Delicious Ltd mitigates the risk of late deliveries interrupting production.
Transparency and Reporting: Delicious Ltd should be transparent about supplier due diligence efforts with stakeholders, including customers, investors, and regulatory bodies. They should regularly report on compliance with ethical and sustainability standards and can publish findings on their website.
For Delicious Ltd, implementing supplier due diligence is essential for several reasons:
Quality Assurance: Ensuring the quality of raw ingredients is crucial for a cake manufacturing organization like Delicious Ltd. By conducting due diligence, the company can verify that suppliers meet specific quality standards, which is essential for producing consistent and high-quality products. If an ingredient such as flour was contaminated, this may result in Delicious Ltd's customers falling ill. This is a risk that needs to be eliminated.
Supply Chain Reliability: International supply chains can be susceptible to disruptions, such as natural disasters, political instability, or economic fluctuations. Supplier due diligence helps identify potential risks within the supply chain and allows the company to develop contingency plans to minimize disruptions.
Ethical Sourcing: Customers and stakeholders increasingly demand transparency and ethical sourcing practices. Due diligence enables Delicious Ltd to assess whether suppliers adhere to ethical standards, such as fair labour practices and environmental sustainability, which can protect the company's reputation and market position. Delicious Ltd risk losing customers, and thus profit, if they fail to conduct due diligence.
Cost Control: By evaluating suppliers' financial stability and pricing structures, the company can negotiate better deals, optimize costs, and avoid unexpected price hikes or financial risks associated with supplier instability.
In conclusion, implementing supplier due diligence is essential for Delicious Ltd due to its complex international supply chains. It helps ensure quality, reliability, and ethical practices among suppliers, while also mitigating risks associated with the supply chain. By effectively implementing due diligence processes, the company can enhance its reputation, protect against disruptions, and maintain cost control.
Tutor Notes
- Remember that due diligence isn't just about ethics. That's a big part of it (checking supply chains for modern day slavery etc). Due diligence is about getting the 5 Rights of Procurement (remember this from Level 4?), it's about ensuring supply chain security and continuity, and about risk aversion too.
- To improve on the essay above you could talk more in detail about where you can get information on suppliers, such as D&B and Companies House for financial information, customer references and checking registrations such as ISO14001. Some of these are specific to the UK, so Delicious Ltd may need to look at international equivalents. You don't have to know what these are for the exam though so don't worry!
- How deep you conduct supplier due diligence depends on how important the supplier is to you. You could mention this in your conclusion and bring it back to Delicious Ltd - the flour supplier is probably very important, but the supplier of stationary for the workers in the office is probably less so. So Delicious need to do thorough due diligence on the flour supplier and less on the stationary guys. Kraljic is the tool for this.
- Because this is a case study question, you don't have to bring in any real life examples. But if the question was more open e.g. discuss how a procurement manager can do Due Diligence, you could talk about a real life example, so have one in your back pocket for the exam
- For a really high score you could mention this: Home - KnowTheChain

See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Intro - what is it
P1 - what makes up the informal organisation. Example
P2 - positive
P3 - negative
Conclusion - organisations need to appreciate its existence, harness the positive (communication and helping each other) but mitigate the bad (cliques and rumours).
Example Essay
The "Informal Organization" refers to the unofficial, and often spontaneous network of relationships, interactions, and communication that develop among employees within an organization. It exists alongside the formal structure and hierarchy of the organization, which is usually defined by the organizational chart, job roles, and official reporting relationships. The informal organization, on the other hand, is not documented or officially sanctioned but plays a significant role in shaping the work environment and influencing how work gets done.
The informal organisation is composed of : social networking (informal groups of friends), the Grapevine (informal messages, rumours) and collective values (groups making assumptions - familiarity breeds contempt). An example of this may be employees from different departments who routinely have lunch together and 'gossip' about the company. The Informal Organization exists in all types of organisation, regardless of the formal structure and it can have both positive and negative impacts on an organization:
Positive Impact:
Enhanced Communication: Informal networks often facilitate communication and information flow that might be limited within the formal structure. Employees can share ideas, solutions, and concerns more freely, leading to increased innovation and problem-solving.
Rapid Response to Change: Informal groups can adapt quickly to changes in the work environment, helping employees cope with uncertainty and transitions. They can be valuable during times of crisis or when the organization needs to pivot.
Social Support: Informal relationships can provide emotional support and a sense of belonging, reducing workplace stress and improving employee morale and job satisfaction. This can lead to higher retention rates and productivity. This is particularly true when activities or hobbies are included, for example a group of colleagues who create a football league and play after work.
Knowledge Transfer: Informal networks often facilitate the transfer of tacit knowledge (knowledge that is not easily documented) among employees, helping with onboarding, skill development, and organizational learning. For example, a more senior employee telling a new starter that Client A is a hothead so to make sure you answer his emails first.
Problem Resolution: Employees within informal networks may assist each other in resolving work-related issues, leading to quicker problem resolution and improved overall efficiency.
Negative Impact:
Cliques and Exclusivity: Informal groups can sometimes lead to cliques or exclusionary behaviour, which may create a sense of favouritism or inequality. This can negatively impact morale and teamwork. For example if the manager plays in the football league mentioned above he may consciously or unconsciously pick someone else who plays football for a promotion.
Resistance to Change: In some cases, informal groups may resist organizational changes that threaten their established norms or power dynamics, hindering the implementation of necessary reforms.
Gossip and Rumours: Informal communication can lead to the spreading of rumours, misinformation, or negative perceptions, which can harm employee morale and create a culture of distrust.
Conflict and Discord: Informal networks can sometimes breed conflicts and rivalries, which may spill over into the formal organization and disrupt teamwork and productivity. This may be those who play football vs those who don't.
Lack of Accountability: In the absence of clear reporting structures, the informal organization can undermine accountability, as individuals may not be held responsible for their actions or decisions.
In summary, the informal organization can have a significant impact on an organization, both positive and negative. Understanding and managing these informal dynamics is essential for creating a productive and harmonious work environment. The organisation should foster a culture of inclusivity and diversity to reduce the formation of cliques and utilise informal networks for knowledge sharing and employee engagement initiatives.
Tutor Notes
- The football example is from my own personal experience. Another example is a split between people who go for a drink after work and those who don't.
- Informal organisations is on p. 250 of the study guide. It came up as a topic in May 22 but that was about how it can impact change, specifically. So you could get a question like the above on pros and cons. Or a question with a case study.
- I love this quote: "Gossip is just the news wearing a tutu." - Barbara Kingsolver. I think it perfectly sums up the informal organisation. It's communication channels and relationships, just in a tutu.