Online Access Free Marketing-Cloud-Intelligence Practice Test
| Exam Code: | Marketing-Cloud-Intelligence |
| Exam Name: | Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional Exam |
| Certification Provider: | Salesforce |
| Free Question Number: | 64 |
| Posted: | Jul 14, 2026 |
A technical architect is provided with the logic and Opportunity file shown below:
The opportunity status logic is as follows:
For the opportunity stages "Interest", "Confirmed Interest" and "Registered", the status should be "Open".
For the opportunity stage "Closed", the opportunity status should be closed Otherwise, return null for the opportunity status
Given the above file and logic and assuming that the file is mapped in a GENERIC data stream type with the following mapping:
"Day" - Standard "Day" field
"Opportunity Key" > Main Generic Entity Key
"Opportunity Stage" - Main Generic Entity Attribute
"Opportunity Count" - Generic Custom Metric
A pivot table was created to present the count of opportunities in each stage. The pivot table is filtered on Jan 11th. What is the number of opportunities in the Interest stage?
Client has provided sample flies of their data from the following data sources:
Google Campaign Manager
Below are the requirements from the client and additional information:
* The sources are linked to each other by shared Media Buy names.
* In addition-to the mutual Media Buys, the sources contain campaign and site values. However, the client would like to see the campaign/site values coming from Google CM and not from Google DV360.
* The source of truth for cost is Google DV360.
As a first step, a Parent-Child relationship was created between the two files, and the following mapping was performed, within both data streams:
Please note:
* All other measurements were mapped as well to the appropriate fields.
* No other mapping manipulations or formulas were implemented.
How many records will the merged table hold?
Which three entities and/or functions can be used in an expression when building a calculated dimension?
Your client would like to create a new harmonization field - Exam Topic.
The below table represents the harmonization logic from each source.
As can be seen from the table there are in fact two fields that hold a certain connection: Exam ID and Exam Topic. The connection indicates that where an Exam ID is found -a single Exam Topic value is associated with it.
The Client has a requirement to be able to view measurements from all data sources sliced by Exam Topic values as seen in the following example:
Which harmonization feature should an Implementation engineer use to meet the client's requirement?