An organization uses Nutanix Disaster Recovery with automatic virtual network creation in the Nutanix Cloud AZ.
After a successful failback operation from the Nutanix Cloud AZ to the on-premises site, what is the expected behavior regarding the dynamically created virtual networks at the recovery site?

An administrator is managing a Nutanix environment via Prism Central and has two VMs running on AHV:
"ERP-PROD": A mission-critical VM protected by a Synchronous replication schedule (0 RPO) to a secondary site.
"REPORTING-DEV": A non-critical VM protected by an Asynchronous replication schedule (hourly RPO) to the same secondary site.
Following a corrupted application update, the administrator decides to manually recover both VMs locally.
What will be the outcome of this manual recovery attempt?

An organization is implementing a Disaster Recovery solution to protect critical workloads by failing them over to a NC2-on-Azure cluster.
The NC2 environment utilizes Flow Virtual Networking (FVN) for overlay networking. The administrator needs to ensure that when VMs failover to Azure, their IP addresses are predictable and consistent with the application requirements.
Which configuration strategy should the administrator use in the Recovery Plan to achieve predictable IP assignment for the recovered VMs?

In the case of a protection domain containing more than 500 VMs, what is the first step an engineer must take before migrating to Prism Central-based protection policies while ensuring all VMs remain protected?

An administrator is configuring Disaster Recovery between an on-prem availability zone (AZ) and an NC2 cluster hosted in a public cloud. The business requires cross-cluster live migration between on-prem and NC2 without IP changes.
Which configuration must be satisfied to meet this requirement?