Online Access Free NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Practice Test
| Exam Code: | NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer |
| Exam Name: | PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer |
| Certification Provider: | PECB |
| Free Question Number: | 83 |
| Posted: | Sep 05, 2025 |
According to the NIS 2 Directive, what is the default frequency at which peer reviews occur?
Scenario 5:Based in Altenberg, Germany, Astral Nexus Power is an innovative company founded by visionary engineers and scientists focused on pioneering technologies in the electric power sector. It focuses on the development of next-generation energy storage solutions powered by cutting-edge quantum materials. Recognizing the critical importance of securing its energy infrastructure, the company has adopted the NIS 2 Directive requirements. In addition, it continually cooperates with cybersecurity experts to fortify its digital systems, protect against cyber threats, and ensure the integrity of the power grid. By incorporating advanced security protocols, the company contributes to the overall resilience and stability of the European energy landscape.
Dedicated to ensuring compliance with NIS 2 Directive requirements, the company initiated a comprehensive journey toward transformation, beginning with an in-depth comprehension of its structure and context, which paved the way for the clear designation of roles and responsibilities related to security, among others. The company has appointed a Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) who is responsible to set the strategic direction for cybersecurity and ensure the protection of information assets. The CISO reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Astral Nexus Power which helps in making more informed decisions concerning risks, resources, and investments. To effectively carry the roles and responsibilities related to information security, the company established a cybersecurity team which includes the company's employees and an external cybersecurity consultant to guide them.
Astral Nexus Power is also focused on managing assets effectively. It consistently identifies and categorizes all of its digital assets, develops an inventory of all assets, and assesses the risks associated with each asset. Moreover, it monitors and maintains the assets and has a process for continual improvement in place. The company has also assigned its computer security incident response team (CSIRT) with the responsibility to monitor its on and off premises internet-facing assets, which help in managing organizational risks.
Furthermore, the company initiates a thorough process of risk identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment. By identifying operational scenarios, which are then detailed in terms of assets, threats, and vulnerabilities, the company ensures a comprehensive identification and understanding of potential risks. This understanding informs the selection and development of risk treatment strategies, which are then communicated and consulted upon with stakeholders. Astral Nexus Power's commitment is further underscored by a meticulous recording and reporting of these measures, fostering transparency and accountability.
Has Astral Nexus Power followed all the necessary steps to manage assets in cyberspace in accordance with best practices? Refer to scenario 5.
Scenario 7:CleanHydro is a forward-thinking company operating in the wastewater industry. Based in Stockholm, Sweden, the company is dedicated to revolutionizing wastewater treatment processes using advanced automated technology aiming to reduce environmental impact.
Recognizing the paramount importance of robust cybersecurity measures to protect its advanced technologies, CleanHydro is committed to ensuring compliance with the NIS 2 Directive. In line with this commitment, the company has initiated a comprehensive employee training program. To do so, the company adheres to Sweden's national cybersecurity strategy, which includes objectives, governance frameworks to guide strategy implementation and define roles and responsibilities at the national level, risk assessment mechanism, incident preparedness measures, a list of involved authorities and stakeholders, and coordination policies.
In addition, CleanHydro engaged GuardSecurity, an external cybersecurity consultancy firm, to evaluate and potentially improve the cybersecurity infrastructure of the company to ensure compliance with the NIS 2 Directive. GuardSecurity focused on strengthening the risk management process of the company.
The company started determining competence development needs by considering competence levels, comparing them with required competence levels, and then prioritizing actions to address competence gaps found based on risk-based thinking. Based on this determination, the company planned the competence development activities and defined the competence development program type and structure. To provide the training and awareness programs, the company contracted CyberSafe, a reputable training provider, to provide the necessary resources, such as relevant documentation or tools for effective training delivery. The company's top management convened a meeting to establish a comprehensive cybersecurity awareness training policy. It was decided that cybersecurity awareness training sessions would be conducted twice during the onboarding process for new employee to instill a culture of cybersecurity from the outset and following a cybersecurity incident.
In line with the NIS 2 compliance requirements, CleanHydro acknowledges the importance of engaging in communication with communities consisting of other essential and important entities. These communities are formed based on industry sectors, critical infrastructure sectors, or other relevant classifications. The company recognizes that this communication is vital for sharing and receiving crucial cybersecurity information that contributes to the overall security of wastewater management operations.
When developing its cybersecurity communication strategy and setting objectives, CleanHydto engaged with interested parties, including employees, suppliers, and service providers, to understand their concerns and gain insights. Additionally, the company identified potential stakeholders who has expressed interest in its activities, products, and services. These activities aimed to contribute to the achievement of the overall objectives of its cybersecurity communication strategy, ensuring that it effectively addressed the needs of all relevant parties.
Based on scenario 7, the training provider was responsible for providing the necessary resources for training, such as relevant documentation or tools. Is this alignment with best practices?
Scenario 8: FoodSafe Corporation is a well-known food manufacturing company in Vienna, Austria, which specializes in producing diverse products, from savory snacks to artisanal desserts. As the company operates in regulatory environment subject to this NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has employed a variety of techniques for cybersecurity testing to safeguard the integrity and security of its food production processes.
To conduct an effective vulnerability assessment process, FoodSafe Corporation utilizes a vulnerability assessment tool to discover vulnerabilities on network hosts such as servers and workstations. Additionally, FoodSafe Corporation has made a deliberate effort to define clear testing objectives and obtain top management approval during the discovery phase. This structured approach ensures that vulnerability assessments are conducted with clear objectives and that the management team is actively engaged and supports the assessment process, reinforcing the company's commitment to cybersecurity excellence.
In alignment with the NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has incorporated audits into its core activities, starting with an internal assessment followed by an additional audit conducted by its partners. To ensure the effectiveness of these audits, the company meticulously identified operational sectors, procedures, and policies. However, FoodSafe Corporation did not utilize an organized audit timetable as part of its internal compliance audit process. While FoodSafe's Corporation organizational chart does not clearly indicate the audit team's position, the internal audit process is well-structured. Auditors familiarize themselves with established policies and procedures to gain a comprehensive understanding of their workflow. They engage in discussions with employees further to enhance their insights, ensuring no critical details are overlooked.
Subsequently, FoodSafe Corporation's auditors generate a comprehensive report of findings, serving as the foundation for necessary changes and improvements within the company. Auditors also follow up on action plans in response to nonconformities and improvement opportunities.
The company recently expanded its offerings by adding new products and services, which had an impact on its cybersecurity program. This required the cybersecurity team to adapt and ensure that these additions were integrated securely into their existing framework. FoodSafe Corporation commitment to enhancing its monitoring and measurement processes to ensure product quality and operational efficiency. In doing so, the company carefully considers its target audience and selects suitable methods for reporting monitoring and measurement results. This incudes incorporating additional graphical elements and labeling of endpoints in their reports to provide a clearer and more intuitive representation of data, ultimately facilitating better decision-making within the organization.
Which change factors impacted FoodSafe's Corporation cybersecurity program? Refer to scenario 8.
Scenario 1:
into incidents that could result in substantial material or non-material damage. When it comes to identifying and mitigating risks, the company has employed a standardized methodology. It conducts thorough risk identification processes across all operational levels, deploys mechanisms for early risk detection, and adopts a uniform framework to ensure a consistent and effective incident response. In alignment with its incident reporting plan, SecureTech reports on the initial stages of potential incidents, as well as after the successful mitigation or resolution of the incidents.
Moreover, SecureTech has recognized the dynamic nature of cybersecurity, understanding the rapid technological evolution. In response to the ever-evolving threats and to safeguard its operations, SecureTech took a proactive approach by implementing a comprehensive set of guidelines that encompass best practices, effectively safeguarding its systems, networks, and data against threats. The company invested heavily in cutting-edge threat detection and mitigation tools, which are continuously updated to tackle emerging vulnerabilities. Regular security audits and penetration tests are conducted by third-party experts to ensure robustness against potential breaches. The company also prioritizes the security of customers' sensitive information by employing encryption protocols, conducting regular security assessments, and integrating multi-factor authentication across its platforms.
To improve its cybersecurity strategies, SecureTech has implemented several practices. What type of governance do these practices focus on improving? Refer to scenario 1.