To accomplish the task of not steering specific domains to the Netskope Cloud while using the Explicit Proxy over Tunnel (EPoT) steering method, you would define exception domains in the PAC file (A). This is because the PAC file is used to specify which domains should bypass the proxy and connect directly, thus allowing for granular control over the traffic that is steered to Netskope1.

The reported issue of slow website and SaaS application access for users in the San Francisco branch office, despite being connected to a Netskope data plane in New York, can be attributed to the geographical distance between the user location and the data plane. The Netskope Security Cloud operates through a distributed network of data planes strategically placed in various regions. When users connect to a data plane that is geographically distant, it can result in latency due to longer network traversal times. In this case, the closest Netskope data plane to San Francisco might be unavailable or experiencing high load, leading to performance issues. To address this, consider optimizing data plane selection based on proximity to the user location or investigating any data plane availability or performance issues.
:
Netskope Cloud Security
Netskope Resources
Netskope Documentation

Netskope Real-time Protection policy evaluation follows a specific order of precedence to ensure that the most appropriate and security-focused policies are applied first. According to Netskope's policy documentation, the recommended policy order is Threat policies first, followed by Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) policies, then CASB policies, and finally Web policies. This ordering ensures that potentially malicious content is caught before CASB or web controls are evaluated, and that isolation policies are applied before content categorization rules. This layered order reflects the principle that security intent should take precedence over access decisions. Placing Threat policies last would allow users to interact with malicious content before being blocked, which is operationally unacceptable in a security architecture.

Netskope offers multiple supported pathways for ingesting events, alerts, and web transaction data into a SIEM. Three documented methods include: using custom API calls via the Netskope REST API to pull data programmatically into a data lake or SIEM pipeline; using syslog directly, which is supported for integration with tools such as Splunk where the SIEM can receive syslog-formatted data; and using Cloud Log Shipper to export log data to cloud storage repositories such as Amazon S3 or Azure Blob Storage, which can then be consumed by the SIEM. The Netskope Publisher is used for private application connectivity, not for log streaming. Each method has different latency and throughput characteristics and should be selected based on the SIEM architecture and organizational data volume requirements.

When the Netskope Client is deployed alongside a VPN solution, the Steering Configuration must be carefully configured to ensure traffic is correctly split between Netskope and the VPN. The recommended approach is to configure a steering exception in the Netskope Client for the VPN server's FQDN and IP address. This exception instructs the Netskope Client to bypass those specific destinations, allowing the VPN client to establish its tunnel directly to the VPN server without interference. Once the VPN tunnel is established, traffic destined for the corporate network routes through the VPN while all other Internet-bound traffic continues to be steered by the Netskope Client. SSL policy modifications and Real-time Protection policies are not the correct mechanism for managing client-level traffic steering splits between Netskope and VPN clients.