Online Access Free PMI-200 Practice Test

A software development team is working in an environment in which increased competition, demanding customer expectations, and new technological developments pose significant challenges. How should the team plan improvements to their product?

• A.Hold regular retrospectives and have team members commit to specific actions.
• B.Encourage team members to write code that is tightly coupled together.
• C.Allow team members to choose improvement items and trust their judgment.
• D.Follow the project schedule created at the start of the project.

An agile team had unexpected technical problems in a project and was not able to complete the deliverables on time. During the retrospective meeting, the team openly discussed the causes for these issues and what can be done to avoid similar situations in the future.
What agile values and principles did the team demonstrate?

• A.The team shows respect for one another by listening to everyone's opinions and valuing human interaction during face-to-face meetings.
• B.The team eliminates potential waste by discussing who should be responsible for future risk management by actively applying the pi an-do-check-act (PDCA) method.
• C.The team is being proactive by discussing how to better balance demands and capacity and make sure they have the right competencies.
• D.The team is providing one another with fast feedback to find those responsible for any mistakes so they can be avoided in the future.

The first project vision statement meeting for a newly formed team did not achieve its outcome. Lack of participation combined with conflicting views of those who participated led to disagreement on how to proceed.
How can the team improve their collaboration?

• A.Seek assistance from the scrum master to mediate the conflict.
• B.Set clear expectations and allow everyone to contribute.
• C.Ask senior management to address the situation.
• D.Prepare the project vision statement and then present it to the team.

At an iteration review, the product owner indicated that the work delivered did not meet expectations. The project team is surprised.
How should this situation have been prevented?

• A.The team should have conducted more demonstrations with the product owner during the iteration.
• B.The testers should have ensured that test cases accurately reflected the product owner's expectations.
• C.The team should have reviewed the definition of done prior to the iteration review.
• D.The product owner should have provided clearer explanations during the planning meeting.

A software company is developing an accounting software system to market to customers. The team has been working on the project for six weeks and has great velocity. One of the major stakeholders approached the scrum master and asked for a bi-weekly status report because they feel they are not being properly updated.
How should the scrum master respond to this request?

• A.Create and update bi-weekly project status reports for the stakeholder who requested the report.
• B.Escalate this to the stakeholder's supervisor because this is an unreasonable request.
• C.Ignore the stakeholder's request and continue working on the project as they have been for the past six weeks.
• D.Inform the stakeholder that all updates are provided in the sprint review sessions and encourage them to attend