A Machine Learning team uses Amazon SageMaker to train an Apache MXNet handwritten digit classifier model using a research dataset. The team wants to receive a notification when the model is overfitting. Auditors want to view the Amazon SageMaker log activity report to ensure there are no unauthorized API calls. What should the Machine Learning team do to address the requirements with the least amount of code and fewest steps?
Correct Answer: C
Question 82
You have trained a deep neural network model on Google Cloud. The model has low loss on the training data, but is performing worse on the validation dat a. You want the model to be resilient to overfitting. Which strategy should you use when retraining the model?
Correct Answer: B
Applying a L2 regularization parameter of 0.4 and decreasing the learning rate by a factor of 10 can help to reduce overfitting and make the model more resilient. Source: Google Cloud
Question 83
You are an ML engineer at a travel company. You have been researching customers' travel behavior for many years, and you have deployed models that predict customers' vacation patterns. You have observed that customers' vacation destinations vary based on seasonality and holidays; however, these seasonal variations are similar across years. You want to quickly and easily store and compare the model versions and performance statistics across years. What should you do?
Correct Answer: D
* Option A is incorrect because Cloud SQL is a relational database service that is not designed for storing and comparing model performance statistics. It would require writing complex SQL queries to perform * the comparison, and it would not provide any visualization or analysis tools. * Option B is incorrect because Vertex AI does not support creating versions of models for each season per year. Vertex AI models are versioned based on the training data and hyperparameters, not on external factors such as seasonality or holidays. Moreover, the Evaluate tab of the Vertex AI UI only shows the performance metrics of a single model version, not across multiple versions. * Option C is incorrect because Kubeflow is a different platform than Vertex AI, and it does not integrate well with Vertex AI Pipelines. Kubeflow experiments are used to group pipeline runs that share a common goal or objective, not to compare performance statistics across different seasons or years. Kubeflow UI does not provide any tools to compare the results across the experiments, and it would require switching between different platforms to access the data. * Option D is correct because Vertex ML Metadata is a service that allows storing and tracking metadata associated with machine learning workflows, such as models, datasets, metrics, and events. Events are user-defined labels that can be used to group or slice the metadata for analysis. By using seasons and years as events, you can easily store and compare the performance statistics of each version of your models across different time periods. Vertex ML Metadata also provides tools to visualize and analyze the metadata, such as the ML Metadata Explorer and the What-If Tool.
Question 84
You have deployed multiple versions of an image classification model on Al Platform. You want to monitor the performance of the model versions overtime. How should you perform this comparison?
Your company manages an application that aggregates news articles from many different online sources and sends them to users. You need to build a recommendationmodel that will suggest articles to readers that are similar to the articles they are currently reading. Which approach should you use?
Correct Answer: B
* Option A is incorrect because creating a collaborative filtering system that recommends articles to a user based on the user's past behavior is not the best approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading. Collaborative filtering is a method of recommendation that uses the ratings or preferences of other users to predict the preferences of a target user1. However, this method does not consider the content or features of the articles, and may not be able to find articles that are similar in terms of topic, style, or sentiment. * Option B is correct because encoding all articles into vectors using word2vec, and building a model that returns articles based on vector similarity is a suitable approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading. Word2vec is a technique that learns low-dimensional and dense representations of words from a large corpus of text, such that words that are semantically similar have similar vectors2. By applying word2vec to the articles, we can obtain vector representations of the articles that capture their meaning and usage. Then, we can use a similarity measure, such as cosine similarity, to find articles that have similar vectors to the current article3. * Option C is incorrect because building a logistic regression model for each user that predicts whether an article should be recommended to a user is not a feasible approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading. Logistic regression is a supervised learning method that models the probability of a binary outcome (such as recommend or not) based on some input features (such as user profile or article content)4. However, this method requires a large amount of labeled data for each user, which may not be available or scalable. Moreover, this method does not directly measure the similarity between articles, but rather the likelihood of a user's preference. * Option D is incorrect because manually labeling a few hundred articles, and then training an SVM classifier based on the manually classified articles that categorizes additional articles into their respective categories is not an effective approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they * are currently reading. SVM (support vector machine) is a supervised learning method that finds a hyperplane that separates the data into different classes (suchas news categories) with the maximum margin5. However, this method also requires a large amount of labeled data, which may be costly and time-consuming to obtain. Moreover, this method does not account for the fine-grained similarity between articles within the same category, or the cross-category similarity between articles from different categories. References: * Collaborative filtering * Word2vec * Cosine similarity * Logistic regression * SVM
