Question 56
You have been asked to evaluate how EIGRP is functioning in a customer network.







What percent of R1's interfaces bandwidth is EIGRP allowed to use?







What percent of R1's interfaces bandwidth is EIGRP allowed to use?
Question 57
Refer to the exhibit.

R1 and R2 are unable to establish an EIGRP adjacency. Which action corrects the problem?
d

R1 and R2 are unable to establish an EIGRP adjacency. Which action corrects the problem?
d
Question 58
Refer to the exhibit. Which interoperability technique implemented on the dual-stack routers would allow connectivity between IPv6 sites across automatic created tunnels using the 2002::/16 prefix?


Question 59
Refer to the exhibit. Which networking challenge is the most important issue to address to enable optimal communication between the networks at Company A and Company B?
Question 60
Route.com is a small IT corporation that is attempting to implement the network shown in the exhibit.
Currently the implementation is partially completed. OSPF has been configured on routers Chicago and NewYork. The SO/O interface on Chicago and the SO/1 interface on NewYork are in Area 0. The loopbackO interface on NewYork is in Area 1. However, they cannot ping from the serial interface of the Seattle router to the loopback interface of the NewYork router. You have been asked to complete the implementation to allow this ping.
ROUTE.com's corporate implementation guidelines require:
* The OSPF process ID for all routers must be 10.
* The routing protocol for each interface must be enabled under the routing process.
* The routing protocol must be enabled for each interface using the most specific wildcard mask possible.
* The serial link between Seattle and Chicago must be in OSPF area 21.
* OSPF area 21 must not receive any inter-area or external routes.
Network Information
Seattle
S0/0 192.168.16.5/30 - Link between Seattle and Chicago
Secret Password: cisco
Chicago
S0/0 192.168.54.9/30 - Link between Chicago and NewYork
S0/1 192.168.16.6/30 - Link between Seattle and Chicago Secre
Password: cisco
NewYork
S0/1 192.168.54.10/30 - Link between Chicago and NewYork
Loopback0 172.16.189.189
Secret Password: cisco




Currently the implementation is partially completed. OSPF has been configured on routers Chicago and NewYork. The SO/O interface on Chicago and the SO/1 interface on NewYork are in Area 0. The loopbackO interface on NewYork is in Area 1. However, they cannot ping from the serial interface of the Seattle router to the loopback interface of the NewYork router. You have been asked to complete the implementation to allow this ping.
ROUTE.com's corporate implementation guidelines require:
* The OSPF process ID for all routers must be 10.
* The routing protocol for each interface must be enabled under the routing process.
* The routing protocol must be enabled for each interface using the most specific wildcard mask possible.
* The serial link between Seattle and Chicago must be in OSPF area 21.
* OSPF area 21 must not receive any inter-area or external routes.
Network Information
Seattle
S0/0 192.168.16.5/30 - Link between Seattle and Chicago
Secret Password: cisco
Chicago
S0/0 192.168.54.9/30 - Link between Chicago and NewYork
S0/1 192.168.16.6/30 - Link between Seattle and Chicago Secre
Password: cisco
NewYork
S0/1 192.168.54.10/30 - Link between Chicago and NewYork
Loopback0 172.16.189.189
Secret Password: cisco






