Free Access Cisco.300-410.v2025-02-03.q609 Practice Test (Page 59)

Question 286

Refer to the exhibit.

A network administrator is using the DNA Assurance Dashboard panel to troubleshoot an OSPF adjacency that failed between Edge_NYC interface GigabitEthernet1/3 with Neighbor Edge_SNJ. The administrator observes that the neighborship is stuck in exstart state. How does the administrator fix this issue?

A.Configure to match the OSPF interface speed and duplex settings on both routers.

B.Configure to match the OSPF interface MTU settings on both routers.

C.Configure to match the OSPF interface unique IP address and subnet mask on both routers.

D.Configure to match the OSPF interface network types on both routers.

Question 287

Refer to the exhibit.

During troubleshooting it was discovered that the device is not reachable using a secure web browser.
What is needed to fix the problem?

A.permit tcp port 443

B.permit tcp port 22

C.permit tcp port 465.

D.permit udp port 465

Question 288

Configure individual VRFs for each customer according to the topology to achieve these goals :

SW1

SW2

SW3

Correct Answer:

Solution:
Use cu-red under interfaces facing SW1 & SW3:
On R1:
interface Ethernet0/0
ip vrf forwarding cu-red
ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
Check reachability to SW1:
R1#ping vrf cu-red 192.168.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.2.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
On R2:
interface Ethernet0/0
ip vrf forwarding cu-red
ip address 192.168.2.254 255.255.255.0
Check reachability to SW3:
R2#ping vrf cu-red 192.168.2.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Use vrf cu-green for SW2 & SW4:
On R1:
interface Ethernet0/1
ip vrf forwarding cu-green
ip address 192.168.20.254 255.255.255.0
Test reachability to SW2:
R1#ping vrf cu-green 192.168.20.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.22.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
On R2:
interface Ethernet0/1
ip vrf forwarding cu-green
ip address 192.168.22.254 255.255.255.0
Test reachability to SW4:
R2#ping vrf cu-green 192.168.22.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
On R1:
interface Ethernet0/2.100
mpls ip
!
interface Ethernet0/2.200
mpls ip
!
Configure BGP:
router bgp 65000
neighbor 10.10.10.2 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.10.20.2 remote-as 65000
!
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 10.10.10.2 activate
neighbor 10.10.20.2 activate
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf cu-green
redistribute connected
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf cu-red
redistribute connected
exit-address-family
!
R1(config)#ip vrf cu-red
R1(config-vrf)#route-target both 65000:100
!
R1(config)#ip vrf cu-green
R1(config-vrf)#route-target both 65000:200
On R2:
interface Ethernet0/2.100
mpls ip
!
interface Ethernet0/2.200
mpls ip
!
router bgp 65000
neighbor 10.10.10.1 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.10.20.1 remote-as 65000
!
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 10.10.10.1 activate
neighbor 10.10.20.1 activate
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf cu-green
redistribute connected
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf cu-red
redistribute connected
exit-address-family
R2(config)#ip vrf cu-red
R2(config-vrf)#route-target both 65000:100
!
R2(config)#ip vrf cu-green
R2(config-vrf)#route-target both 65000:200
Verification:
From SW1 to SW3:
SW1#ping 192.168.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
But can't Reach SW2 or SW4 in VRF cu-green:
SW1#ping 192.168.22.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.22.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
U. U.U
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
SW1#ping 192.168.20.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
U. U.U
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Same Test for SW2:
From SW2 to SW4:
SW2#ping 192.168.20.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
But can't Reach SW3 or SW1 in VRF cu-red:
SW2#ping 192.168.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
U. U.U
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
SW2#ping 192.168.2.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.2.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
U. U.U
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Both R1 & R2 has separate tables for VRFs cu-red and cu-green.

Question 289

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is investigating an OSPF issue reported by the Cisco DNA Assurance Center. Which action resolves the issue?

A.An ACL entry blocking multicast on the interfaces Allow multicast through the interface ACL

B.One of the neighbor links is down Bring the interface up by running shut and no shut

C.One of the interfaces is using the wrong authentication Match interface authentication on both links

D.One of the interfaces is using the wrong MTU Match interface MTU on both links

Question 290

Refer to the exhibit.

The network administrator configured redistribution on an ASBR to reach to all WAN networks but failed Which action resolves the issue?

A.The route map must have the keyword prefix-list to evaluate the prefix list entries

B.The OSPF process must have a metric when redistributing prefixes from EIGRP.

C.The route map EIGRP->OSPF must have the 10.0.106.0/24 entry to exist in one of the three prefix lists to pass

D.EIGRP must redistribute the 10.0.106.0/24 route instead of using the network statement

Other Version: 10252Cisco.300-410.v2024-12-18.q447; 3703Cisco.300-410.v2023-04-25.q268; 3982Cisco.300-410.v2023-01-28.q148; 2282Cisco.300-410.v2022-11-26.q118; 3201Cisco.300-410.v2022-07-26.q136; 4013Cisco.300-410.v2022-05-02.q98; 7214Cisco.300-410.v2022-01-27.q256

Latest Upload: 286PaloAltoNetworks.NGFW-Engineer.v2026-05-01.q43; 414Nokia.4A0-113.v2026-05-01.q69; 447EC-COUNCIL.312-49v11.v2026-04-30.q214; 414Microsoft.MB-820.v2026-04-30.q101; 284Salesforce.MC-202.v2026-04-30.q57; 327BICSI.INSTC_V8.v2026-04-29.q53; 462NMLS.MLO.v2026-04-28.q82; 303NCARB.Project-Management.v2026-04-28.q27; 556EMC.D-AV-DY-23.v2026-04-27.q184; 1402ServiceNow.CSA.v2026-04-27.q483

Question 286

Question 287

Question 288

Question 289

Question 290

Download PDF File