Question 31

Scenario: Your organization wants to empower different teams with custom AI agents using Microsoft Copilot Studio. Some teams only need simple, personal productivity agents based on SharePoint content, while others need enterprise-grade agents that integrate with back-end systems and require full lifecycle governance. Leadership asks you to identify the scenarios where each Copilot Studio experience-Lite or Full-would be the correct choice.
Which three of the following scenarios align with Microsoft's recommended use cases for choosing either the Lite or Full Copilot Studio experience? (Choose three)
  • Question 32

    A company uses Microsoft Foundry agents.
    You need to ensure that an agent can dynamically use external tools at runtime without updating the agent.
    What should you include in the solution?
  • Question 33

    A company has an Al agent that automates the review of customer feedback stored in a cloud database.
    You plan to generate monthly reports from the agent ' s output to provide insights into customer sentiment and guide product development and marketing.
    You need to ensure that the data ingested by the agent is clean and suitable for the intended use.
    What should you do to prepare the data?
  • Question 34

    Scenario: Your organization creates a new AI Center of Excellence (CoE) to guide enterprise- wide adoption of generative AI. A project team submits a proposal requesting immediate development of a generative AI model. They argue that identifying use cases and validating data quality can wait until after the prototype is built, since the CoE can "fix the data later." You are asked whether this approach aligns with Microsoft's recommended AI adoption lifecycle, which starts with identifying use cases, selecting domain-specific data, preparing and validating that data, designing and training solutions, and then monitoring and adapting them over time.
    According to Microsoft's AI adoption guidance, is it appropriate to skip identifying use cases and validating domain-specific data before beginning AI model development? [Select Yes or No]
  • Question 35

    Case Study 2 - Contoso, Ltd
    Overview
    Contoso, Ltd. is a high-tech manufacturing company that uses Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance.
    Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management, and Dynamics 365 Commerce for its North American operations. The company designs and develops innovative products that have many patents and proprietary technologies. The patents and engineering designs are closely guarded secrets.
    Contoso executives want to integrate and adopt AI solutions to help scale the company in preparation for an anticipated period of rapid growth.
    The company has multiple legal entities and Azure subscriptions that will be used in the adopted AI solutions.
    Requirements
    AI Adoption
    The following executives will have specific responsibilities in the overall AI adoption:
    - Chief Technology Officer (CTO): Select one Dynamics 365 Finance,
    Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management or Dynamics 365 Commerce prebuilt
    AI agent and one custom Microsoft Copilot Studio AI agent to prioritize and deploy during the initial AI adoption phase.
    - Chief Information Officer (CIO): Ensure that appropriate security
    labels are assigned to the data used by the AI agents.
    - Chief Financial Officer (CFO): Analyze the return on investment (ROI) for the AI agents being deployed.
    - Chief Information Security Officer (CISO): Discover and inventory AI
    resources for auditing.
    - Chief Executive Officer (CEO): Ensure that all solutions adhere to
    industry-standard responsible AI practices.
    All AI initiatives and agents will have a detailed business use case, a defined audience profile, and an estimated ROI that will compare the cost savings of the current process against the estimated costs of using the new AI solutions.
    The company's research and development (R&D) department already has a custom Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that contains comprehensive product specifications and compliance data.
    Prebuilt AI Agent
    The CTO has NOT yet selected which prebuilt AI agent to use in Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management. The CTO wants to view available agent templates to identify which agent will add the most business value.
    Depending on which high-priority AI agents are identified, its agent capabilities must be previewed in a discovery meeting with the relevant business operation stakeholders.
    Custom AI Agent
    Contoso has identified the following custom AI agent requirements:
    - The custom AI agent will use data from Dynamics 365 Supply Chain
    Management to answer questions for the manufacturing team as a low-code solution.
    - The custom AI agent will be accessible from within Microsoft Teams.
    - The custom AI agent must be designed to eventually connect to other
    agents that can be selected based on their description.
    - The topics used in the custom AI agent will be selected based NOT on
    a trigger phrase, but on a description of the purpose of the query, to
    make the interactions more conversational.
    - The custom AI agent must be able to answer questions about product
    specifications by using existing technologies. The product
    specifications are maintained by the R&D department.
    - The custom AI agent must be integrated with and accessible from
    Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management.
    - The custom AI agent must be able to use Dynamics 365 Supply Chain
    Management business logic that is stored outside of the application.
    Analysis, Reporting, and Troubleshooting
    Contoso has identified the following analysis, reporting, and troubleshooting requirements:
    - The CISO will audit all the AI solutions monthly for compliance and
    security.
    - The CFO will analyze all the AI solutions quarterly to compare the
    estimated ROI against actual measured efficiencies and adoption. The
    CFO will use the Copilot Studio agent usage estimator to perform this
    analysis.
    - The CISO wants to identify how much sensitive data was accessed for a given AI agent run and who accessed the data. Too much sensitive data accessed by a single user might indicate a high security risk.
    - The CTO wants to track user feedback on the quality of the AI agent
    responses during user interactions with the agents. Consistently poor
    feedback will trigger an escalated reengineering discussion.
    - The CEO wants a quarterly assessment of all the required metrics for
    their specific responsibilities. The tools used for the assessments
    must be Microsoft-recommended and must verify reliability,
    interpretability, fairness, and compliance.
    - The CFO wants to identify how many interactions with the AI agents
    are abandoned on a given day as compared to resolved conversations. Too many abandoned sessions might indicate that Copilot Studio credits are being used inefficiently by end users.
    Which two components for the custom AI agent should you include in the application lifecycle management (AIM) process? Each correct answer presents part of the solution. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.