* A. Expected Outcome of Test
* A test case must clearly state what the expected outcome is, providing a standard against which the results can be measured.
* This ensures testers can validate whether the scenario behaves as intended.
* C. Clear Procedure for Completing the Test
* A well-defined procedure outlines the exact steps required to execute the test, ensuring consistent and repeatable testing.
* This reduces ambiguity and helps identify whether errors are due to the scenario configuration or improper test execution.
* Why Not Other Options?
* B. Name of Test Owner: While helpful for accountability, the name of the test owner is not a required component of the test case itself.
* D. Source Code Being Tested: Fusion scenarios do not typically involve source code. Instead, the focus is on workflow execution and configuration, making this element irrelevant.
References:
* Workfront Training Materials: Test Case Design Best Practices
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Testing and Debugging Scenarios

* Object ID in CRUD Operations:REST APIs commonly use CRUD operations to interact with resources. TheObject IDserves as a unique identifier for the resource and is generally required for the following actions:
* A. Update:
* To update a specific resource, the API must know which resource to modify. The Object ID is used to identify the exact resource that should be updated.
* Example: A PUT or PATCH request typically requires the Object ID in the URL or body of the request.
* URL Example:
PUT /tasks/{id}
* B. Delete:
* Similarly, when deleting a specific resource, the Object ID is needed to ensure the correct resource is removed.
* Example: A DELETE request requires the Object ID in the URL to target the specific resource.
* URL Example:
DELETE /tasks/{id}
* Why Not Other Options?
* C. Respond: This is not a standard CRUD operation in REST APIs and does not involve an Object ID.
* D. Create: The Create operation (typically POST) does not require an Object ID because the resource does not yet exist. Instead, the API usually generates the Object ID after creation.
References:
* REST API Documentation Best Practices: CRUD Operations
* Experience League: Understanding CRUD in Workfront APIs

Step-by-Step Explanation
* Purpose of the Query:
* The task is to retrievefield optionsfrom acustom form field. This operation involves fetching data, not creating or modifying it, which requires a GET method.
* Correct API Structure:
* The URL must follow Workfront's API structure:
ruby
Copy
https://{your-workfront-domain}/attask/api/{version}/{endpoint}
* OptionBfollows this standard structure, where:
* wfdomain.workfront.com is the placeholder for the Workfront instance.
* /attask/api/v12.0 specifies the API version.
* /PARAM/search is the endpoint to search for parameters or fields.
* Why Not Other Options?
* A: The use of POST is incorrect because it is meant for creating or updating resources, not retrieving data. Additionally, the URL structure is incorrect and includes unnecessary query strings (username, password) not relevant for this operation.
* C: While the method GET is correct, the URL (PARAM/search) is incomplete and lacks the required Workfront API structure, making it invalid.
References
* Workfront API Documentation: Querying and Retrieving Custom Form Field Data
* Experience League Community: Best Practices for Using GET Methods in Workfront API=========================

* Understanding the Requirement:
* The user needs to view the exactAPI requestand the correspondingresponsea module executes in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
* This is critical for debugging, troubleshooting, or validating API operations within scenarios.
* Why Option B is Correct:
* Execution History:
* Theexecution historylogs detailed information about every module that runs in a scenario.
* It provides access to theAPI requestsent, including the headers, parameters, and body.
* It also displays theAPI responsereceived, including HTTP status codes, returned data, and error messages (if applicable).
* This feature is indispensable for debugging and verifying the behavior of modules.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A ("Using the Bundle Inspector"):
* The Bundle Inspector provides a view of processed data bundles but does not include API request/response details.
* Option C ("Using the Fusion DevTool scenario debugger"):
* Fusion does not have a specific "DevTool debugger." The execution history serves this purpose.
* Option D ("Using the Fusion DevTool error evaluator"):
* While error logs help evaluate issues, they do not directly show the API request/response unless an error occurs. Execution history is a more comprehensive source of this data.
* Steps to View Execution History:
* Run the scenario or inspect a previously executed scenario.
* Navigate to theExecution Historytab for the scenario.
* Select a specific module to view itsdetails.
* Inspect theAPI request and response, which includes all relevant parameters and data.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Execution History
* Workfront Community: Debugging with Execution History

* B. Incomplete Executions Are Not Stored by Default:
* By default, Workfront Fusion does not store incomplete executions unless this setting is explicitly enabled in the scenario's settings.
* This feature needs to be activated for troubleshooting and manually resolving incomplete executions later.
* D. Resolving Incomplete Executions:
* When an incomplete execution is resumed, the scenario picks up from the point of failure and processes the remaining steps with the data bundle that caused the error.
* This ensures that the scenario completes its intended process without restarting entirely.
* Why Not Other Options?
* A. When incomplete executions are togged, a user must review the History tab to understand the error and then manually run the entire scenario to resolve: This is incorrect because incomplete executions do not require restarting the entire scenario; they continue from the point of failure.
* C. Incomplete executions should be avoided because they only give visibility into better scenario design: This statement is misleading. Incomplete executions are often inevitable and provide critical insights into handling errors and improving scenarios.
References:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Working with Incomplete Executions
* Experience League Community: How to Enable and Manage Incomplete Executions in Fusion