Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
The original hard drive or suspect media should never be used as the source for analysis. The source or original media should be physically secured and only used as the master to create a bit-by-bit image. The original should be stored using the appropriate procedures, depending on location. The image created for forensic analysis should be used. A backup does not preserve 100 percent of the data, such as erased or deleted files and data in slack space-which may be critical to the investigative process. Once data from the source are altered, they may no longer be admissible in court. Continuing the investigation, documenting the date, time and data altered, are actions that may not be admissible in legal proceedings.
The organization would need to know the details of collecting and preserving forensic evidence relevant to their jurisdiction.

A key risk indicator (KRI) is a metric that provides an early warning of potential exposure to a risk. A KRI should be relevant, measurable, timely, and actionable. The most important factor in an organization's selection of a KRI is the criticality of information, which means that the KRI should reflect the value and sensitivity of the information assets that are exposed to the risk. For example, a KRI for data breach risk could be the number of unauthorized access attempts to a database that contains confidential customer data. The criticality of information helps to prioritize the risks and focus on the most significant ones. References:
https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cism https://www.wiley.com/en-us
/CISM+Certified+Information+Security+Manager+Study+Guide-p-9781119801948