Question 6
You want to use NetEdit to configure an AtubaOS-CX switch.
Is this a minimum requirement for setting up communications between the switch and NetEdit?
Solution: Make sure that the SSH server is enabled.
Is this a minimum requirement for setting up communications between the switch and NetEdit?
Solution: Make sure that the SSH server is enabled.
Question 7
Refer to the exhibit.

The company wants AtubaOS-CX switches to provide VXLAN services for several VMs and servers, as shown in the exhibit. Hypervisors will not run VXLAN for this solution. Is this part of a valid configuration to meet the requirements?
Solution: Attach VNIs 5010 and 5020 to interface 1/1/3 on Switch-2.

The company wants AtubaOS-CX switches to provide VXLAN services for several VMs and servers, as shown in the exhibit. Hypervisors will not run VXLAN for this solution. Is this part of a valid configuration to meet the requirements?
Solution: Attach VNIs 5010 and 5020 to interface 1/1/3 on Switch-2.
Question 8
Is this a use case for disabling split-recovery mode on ArubaOS-CX switches in a Virtual Switching Extension (VSX) fabric?
Solution: In situations in which the primary switch fails and then reboots, you want to make the primary switch take over again as the primary switch.
Solution: In situations in which the primary switch fails and then reboots, you want to make the primary switch take over again as the primary switch.
Question 9
Is this a best practice when positioning ArubaOS-CX switches in data center networks?
Solution: Deploy Aruba CX 6300 switches as data center spine switches.
Solution: Deploy Aruba CX 6300 switches as data center spine switches.
Question 10
Refer to the exhibit.

which shows the topology tot an Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (ERPS) solution.
Is this a valid design for the control and protected VLANs on the VSX fabric 1 switches?
Solution: Ring l, instance 1:
control VLAN: 1000 protected VLANs: 51-135 Ring 1, Instance 2:
control VLAN: 1000 protected VLANs: 136-220 Ring 2, Instance 1: control VLAN: 1001 protected VLANs: 181 -200 Ring 2, Instance 2: control VLAN: 1001 protected VLANs: 201 -220

which shows the topology tot an Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (ERPS) solution.
Is this a valid design for the control and protected VLANs on the VSX fabric 1 switches?
Solution: Ring l, instance 1:
control VLAN: 1000 protected VLANs: 51-135 Ring 1, Instance 2:
control VLAN: 1000 protected VLANs: 136-220 Ring 2, Instance 1: control VLAN: 1001 protected VLANs: 181 -200 Ring 2, Instance 2: control VLAN: 1001 protected VLANs: 201 -220