The graphic illustrates a method for developing alternative target architectures in Phase E of the TOGAF ADM1. The method involves identifying and evaluating candidate architectures based on criteria such as business value, cost, risk, and feasibility1. The method helps to identify the most suitable architecture solution for the enterprise.
https://pubs.opengroup.org/togaf-standard/adm-techniques/chap10.html
The graphic illustrates a method that supports the TOGAF ADM by identifying and evaluating alternative target architectures. The process begins with a vision, influenced by principles and requirements, leading to the consideration of alternatives. Each alternative is assessed based on different criteria, leading to the selection of the most suitable target architecture. This isconsistent with the TOGAF approach of developing a set of potential architectures and then selecting the one that best meets the enterprise's needs.

The table describes the steps involved in Phase B (Business Architecture), Phase C (Information Systems Architectures), and Phase D (Technology Architecture) of the TOGAF ADM5. These phases are responsible for developing the target architectures for each domain and identifying the gaps between the baseline and target architectures. The table shows the outputs and outcomes of each phase, as well as the essential knowledge required for each phase.

The technique shown in the example is called relationship mapping. It is a technique that can be used to show how a business architecture addresses stakeholder concerns across different parts of an organization2. It can highlight gaps or overlaps in the coverage of stakeholder concerns by a business architecture. In this case, the technique is used to relate business capabilities to organization units so as to highlight duplication and redundancy.
This modeling technique is referred to as Relationship Mapping. It's used to relate business capabilities to organizational units to highlight areas of duplication and redundancy, as well as to indicate where capabilities are being performed well (green), where there are potential issues (yellow), and where there are significant problems or gaps (red). This visualization helps in understanding the alignment between organizational units and capabilities, and where improvements or changes may be needed.
5.2.1 Capability/Organization Mappinghttps://pubs.opengroup.org/togaf-standard/business-architecture
/business-capabilities.html#_Toc95135898

Business models within the TOGAF standard are used to tailor the enterprise architecture to the specific needs and context of the business. They help in understanding how the business operates, its structure, and how it intends to achieve its goals, which is critical for ensuring that the enterprise architecture aligns with and supports the business objectives.

An information map is essentially a collection of information concepts along with their relationships. It's a visual representation that shows how various types of information are related and used throughout the organization. This can include data entities, their attributes, and the flow of data between different business processes or systems. Information mapping helps in understanding the structure of an organization's data and is a key part of the information system architecture within TOGAF's content framework.