Free Access TheOpenGroup.OGEA-102.v2026-06-30.q45 Practice Test (Page 5)

Question 16

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is that of a senior architect, reporting to the Chief Enterprise Architect, at a medium-sized company with 400 employees. The nature of the business is such that the data and the information stored on the company systems is their major asset and is highly confidential.
The company employees travel extensively for work and must communicate over public infrastructure using message encryption, VPNs, and other standard safeguards. The company has invested in cybersecurity awareness training for all its staff. However, it is recognized that even with good education as well as system security, there is a dependency on third-parly suppliers of infrastructure and software.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework for its Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice. The CTO is the sponsor of the activity.
The Chief Security Officer (CSO) has noted an increase in ransomware (malicious software used in ransom demands) attacks on companies with a similar profile. The CSO recognizes that no matter how much is spent on education, and support, it is likely just a matter of time before the company suffers a significant attack that could completely lock them out of their information assets.
A risk assessment has been done and the company has sought cyber insurance that includes ransomware coverage. The quotation for this insurance is hugely expensive. The CTO has recently read a survey that stated that one in four organizations paying ransoms were still unable to recover their data, while nearly as many were able to recover the data without paying a ransom. The CTO has concluded that taking out cyber insurance in case they need to pay a ransom is not an option.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to describe the steps you would take to improve the resilience of the current architecture?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

A.You would determine business continuity requirements, and undertake a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would make recommendations for change requirements to address the situation and create a change request. You would manage a meeting of the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. Once approved you would produce a new Request for Architecture Work to activate an ADM cycle to carry out a project to define the change.

B.You would monitor for technology changes from your existing suppliers that could improve resilience.
You would prepare and run a disaster recovery planning exercise for a ransomware attack and analyze the performance of the current Enterprise Architecture. Using the findings, you would prepare a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would prepare change requests to address identified gaps. You would add the changes implemented to the Architecture Repository.

C.You would ensure that the company has in place up-to-date processes for managing change to the current Enterprise Architecture. Based on the scope of the concerns raised you recommend that this be managed at the infrastructure level. Changes should be made to the baseline description of the Technology Architecture. The changes should be approved by the Architecture Board and implemented by change management techniques.

D.You would request an Architecture Compliance Review with the scope to examine the company ' s resilience to ransomware attacks. You would identify the departments involved and have them nominate representatives. You would then tailor checklists to address the requirement for increased resilience. You would circulate to the nominated representatives for them to complete. You would then review the completed checklists, identifying and resolving issues. You would then determine and present your recommendations.

Correct Answer: A

Business continuity is the ability of an organization to maintain essential functions during and after a disaster or disruption. Business continuity requirements are the specifications and criteria that define the acceptable level of performance and availability of the business processes and services in the event of a disaster or disruption. A gap analysis is a technique that compares the current state of the architecture with the desired state, and identifies the gaps or differences that need to be addressed. A change request is a formal proposal for an amendment to some product or system, such as the architecture. A Request for Architecture Work is a document that describes the scope, approach, and expected outcomes of an architecture project123 The best answer is A, because it describes the steps that would improve the resilience of the current architecture, which is the ability to withstand and recover from a ransomware attack or any other disruption.
The steps are:
* Determine the business continuity requirements, which specify the minimum acceptable level of performance and availability of the business processes and services in case of a ransomware attack.
This would involve identifying the critical business functions, the recovery time objectives, the recovery point objectives, and the dependencies and resources needed for recovery.
* Undertake a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture, which compares the current state of the architecture with the desired state based on the business continuity requirements. This would involve assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the current architecture, the risks and opportunities for improvement, and the gaps or differences that need to be addressed.
* Make recommendations for change requirements to address the situation and create a change request.
This would involve proposing solutions and alternatives to close the gaps, enhance the resilience, and mitigate the risks of the current architecture. The change request would document the rationale, scope, impact, and benefits of the proposed changes, and seek approval from the relevant stakeholders.
* Manage a meeting of the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. The Architecture Board is a governance body that oversees the architecture work and ensures compliance with the architecture principles, standards, and goals. The meeting would involve presenting the change request, discussing the pros and cons, resolving any issues or conflicts, and obtaining the approval or rejection of the change request.
* Once approved, produce a new Request for Architecture Work to activate an ADM cycle to carry out a project to define the change. The Request for Architecture Work would describe the scope, approach, and expected outcomes of the architecture project that would implement the approved change request.
The Request for Architecture Work would initiate a new cycle of the Architecture Development Method (ADM), which is the core process of the TOGAF standard that guides the development and management of the enterprise architecture.
1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 33: Business Scenarios 2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 30: Gap Analysis 3: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 31:
Architecture Change Management : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 7: Request for Architecture Work : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III:
ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 34: Business Transformation Readiness Assessment : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 30: Gap Analysis : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 31: Architecture Change Management : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI: Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 50:
Architecture Governance : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 7: Request for Architecture Work

Question 17

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect within a clinical research and health technologies company. The company is dedicated to transforming healthcare with new ideas and advancements. The company has multiple divisions that cover different aspects of the business.
The company's Enterprise Architecture (EA) department has mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes following the TOGAF standard.
In addition to the EA program, the company has a number of management
frameworks in use. The Architecture Board includes representatives from each division of the company. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture program. The CIO has actively encouraged architecting with agility within the EA department as the preferred approach for projects.
Many of the company's rivals have begun using Artificial Intelligence (Al) in their operations, and the indications are that this will be transformative for healthcare delivery. This is something the EA department has been interested in for a while, and they had recently submitted an architecture Change Request which was approved. As a result, the CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to investigate the implementation of Al in the company.
Areas for evaluation include:
How can staff use Al daily in their current roles?
How can Al enhance access to care for patients, and how to make that experience seamless?
How can Al offer new workplace platforms and tools to increase efficiency?
Some of the top managers are worried about a change in the way of working, and if it will achieve the goals. Many are not confident that the company's risk management processes are adequate for a company-wide integration of generative Al. There are also questions from staff about whether enough specific guidelines and polices have been put in place for responsible use of Al.
Refer to the scenario
You have been assigned to the architecture development and asked how to address the concerns and manage risk for the project. How do you begin?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

A.You recommend that an analysis of the stakeholders is carried out. This will allow the architects to define groups of stakeholders who have common concerns and include development of a Stakeholder Map. The concerns and relevant views should then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document. To mitigate risk, you include a requirement that there be progressive development of the target architecture to ensure there is regular feedback.

B.You recommend that all the stakeholders be identified, and a Communications Plan created to address the most powerful and influential stakeholders. This plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture with respect to each division and reflects the stakeholders' requirements. You will check with each key stakeholder that their concerns are being addressed. Risk mitigation should be explicitly addressed as a component of the architecture being developed.

C.You recommend creation of a simple solution concept diagram to show how the stakeholders will be impacted, and the benefits to the firm. You would also create a benefits diagram showing the various opportunities from adoption of Al-based solutions. A meeting should be held with the main stakeholders to review the diagrams. They can then decide the priorities and sequencing decisions for the architecture development. Risk will be evaluated when defining the Architecture Roadmap.

D.You recommend that models be created for the Draft Business, Data,Application, and Technology Architectures. These can be used to minimize risk, and make sure that the system meets the local regulations for each division. Together with the problem description, and requirements, these should be included in the Architecture Vision document. A formal review should be held with the stakeholders to verify that their concerns are included in the Architecture Vision.

Correct Answer: A

In this scenario you are right at the start of an ADM cycle: a Request for Architecture Work has been approved to investigate AI, and there are strong stakeholder concerns and risk questions. According to the TOGAF standard, the correct place to start is Phase A: Architecture Vision, with a strong focus on stakeholder management and capturing their concerns and required views.
Option A is the only answer that correctly reflects this:
Stakeholder analysis & Stakeholder Map (Phase A core task)
TOGAF explicitly states that in Phase A you must:
Identify stakeholders
Analyze and group them by common concerns
Use a Stakeholder Map to understand their influence, interest, and required engagement Determine which views/viewpoints are needed to address their concerns in the architecture description coe.qualiware.com+1 Option A says:
"analysis of the stakeholders ... define groups of stakeholders who have common concerns and include development of a Stakeholder Map. The concerns and relevant views should then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document." This is exactly how TOGAF describes stakeholder management and views in Phase A:
Stakeholder Map to classify and prioritize stakeholders
Concerns and required views captured and traced
These elements feeding into the Architecture Vision deliverable Visual Paradigm TOGAF+1 Concerns, views, and Architecture Vision TOGAF emphasizes that architecture views are constructed to address specific stakeholder concerns; you do not just build generic models. opengroup.org+1 Option A explicitly links concerns → views → Architecture Vision, which aligns with TOGAF guidance for early phases.
Capturing this in the Architecture Vision provides a high-level, shared understanding of what the AI initiative is trying to achieve and how stakeholder issues (e.g., responsible AI, risk processes, change in way of working) will be addressed.
Risk management and "architecting with agility"
In the scenario, the CIO has encouraged architecting with agility. TOGAF is compatible with incremental and iterative development of the target architecture, especially when there is high uncertainty and risk. conexiam.com Option A includes:
"a requirement that there be progressive development of the target architecture to ensure there is regular feedback." This "progressive development" and frequent feedback loop is exactly how you mitigate risk in an AI-heavy, change-sensitive initiative:
Frequent stakeholder feedback
Early validation of assumptions
Ability to adjust scope, constraints, and principles as risk and understanding evolve This directly addresses management's worry about the change in the way of working and whether risk management and responsible AI policies are adequate: these become explicit stakeholder concerns and requirements that are iteratively refined.
Why the other options are weaker / not TOGAF-aligned as a starting point Option B Focuses mainly on a Communications Plan and powerful stakeholders.
While TOGAF does expect a stakeholder communications plan, it is derived from a proper stakeholder analysis and Stakeholder Map, not a substitute for it.
It also treats risk as a "component of the architecture" rather than something to be addressed early through stakeholder concerns, principles, and iteration.
Option C
Jumps straight to a solution concept diagram and benefits diagram and defers risk evaluation to when the Architecture Roadmap is defined (Phase E).
In TOGAF, risk and stakeholder concerns must be addressed already in Phase A and refined throughout, not postponed to roadmap development.
Option D
Proposes creating draft Business, Data, Application, and Technology models and putting them into the Architecture Vision.
This is too detailed for the starting point: Phase A is about high-level vision, not full draft core architecture models (those belong in Phases B, C, D).
It also doesn't emphasize Stakeholder Mapping and grouping by concerns, which is central to resolving the worries about way of working, risk, and responsible AI.
In summary, Option A is the best and TOGAF-consistent way to begin:
Start in Phase A: Architecture Vision
Perform stakeholder analysis and create a Stakeholder Map
Define stakeholder concerns and relevant views
Record them in the Architecture Vision
Add an explicit requirement for progressive (iterative) development of the target architecture for continuous feedback and risk mitigation

Question 18

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect at a large technology company with diverse business lines. The company has multiple divisions, engaged in mobile, e-commerce, cloud computing services, and a social network.
The company has an established Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice based on the TOGAF standard, including the TOGAF ADM. The EA program is sponsored by the Chief Information Officer (CIO). The use of EA has enabled the company to gain valuable insights into different parts of the business. One of the primary goals in the EA program charter is to coordinate efforts between the teams in each division. This has made sure that the mobile, e-commerce, cloud, and social media initiatives remain aligned with business strategy.
The practice has an established Architecture Capability and uses iteration for architecture development. The iterative approach is well-suited for modern digital transformation initiatives, where the company must adapt quickly to new business and market challenges. In addition to the EA program, the company uses several management frameworks, including business planning, project/portfolio management, and operations management.
The company is growing rapidly. A consequence of this rapid growth has been the proliferation of multiple IT solutions, with architecture giving way to growth. The company appears to be failing to architect its growth.
Several systems have proved unreliable with some major outages, including the e-commerce system being offline for eight hours at the start of the holiday sales period, as well as the cloud computing services outage, which took down several popular websites. The service management organization within the company has blamed the outages on misalignment of the IT solutions.
The Governing Board has raised concerns about the outages. As a consequence, the CEO has asked for better reporting and management of the IT portfolio. The task has been assigned to the EAteam, with a constraint to maintain business as usual.
Refer to the Scenario
You have been asked to assess the IT solutions to determine where problems are occurring and where change is needed.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?

A.The team should start an iteration cycle by defining the baseline Technology Architecture first to assess the current infrastructure capacity and capability for the company. There should be an assessment of the operational performance data. This is needed to diagnose the causes of the system outages. The results of the assessment can then be used to identify the required changes to make sure that the misalignments between solutions are removed.

B.The team should start an iteration cycle of target architecture definition. The team will then identify the requirements, drivers, issues, and constraints to support the change. The result will be a more resilient architecture to support definition of a set of IT solutions that will address the misalignment. You would ensure that non-functional requirements are well defined to make sure that the target architecture is robust and reliable.

C.The team should commence an architecture development cycle through the architecture definition phases (B-D) with the purpose to understand the causes of the outages. This will allow the concerns of the Governing Board to be addressed through each of the Business, Information Systems, and Technology Architecture phases. This will identify the changes in a structured manner and make sure they address the requirements.

D.The team should evaluate the IT resources across the company against the operational performance data and business needs. This will include a review of availability and responsiveness. You would assess the current applications and technology infrastructure by commencing an iteration cycle following a baseline first architecture development approach. This would allow you to identify improvement opportunities and allow you to determine where misalignment is occurring.

Question 19

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect at a healthcare company. The company operates over 250 hospitals and is dedicated to transforming healthcare with new ideas and advancements. The company has multiple divisions include surgery centers, freestanding emergency departments, urgent care clinics, and physician practices. They also develop and supply a range of products and services, many with specialized systems and clinical needs.
The company's Enterprise Architecture (EA) department has been operating for several years and has mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes following the TOGAF standard. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture program.
Healthcare is a highly controlled sector, and the company must maintain robust security practices to keep patient information private and prevent data breaches. The company shares electronic health records with multiple providers and has standardized its medical coding for billing and reporting.
Many of the company's rivals have begun using Artificial Intelligence (Al) in their operations, and the indications are that this will be transformative for healthcare delivery. This is something the EA department has been interested in for a while, and they had recently submitted an architecture Change Request which was approved. As a result, the CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to implement Al-based solutions in the company.
The project has been established and you have been assigned to work on it. Stakeholders, concerns, and business requirements have been identified. The stakeholders have made it clear that timely implementation of changes can be life-critical, and that changes should be focused on improving patient outcomes. They also have a concern about disruption due to the changes and require the systems to preserve clinical data access and maintain critical life-support systems during any outages.
The scope of what is inside and what is outside the architecture efforts has now been confirmed. Your task is to revisit and review the Architecture Principles, as they form part of the constraints on architecture work.
Refer to the scenario
The EA team leader has asked you to explain which Architecture Principles are most relevant for this project.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
[Note: You should assume the company follows the example set of Architecture Principles that are provided in the TOGAF standard, ADM Techniques, Architecture Principles chapter.]

A.Common Vocabulary and Data Definitions is essential for standardized medical coding and cross- provider data sharing. This ensures the solutions will properly interpret clinical data consistently across divisions. Data Security is critical to protect patient information aligned with the regulations. It ensures data integrity and system availability for critical care. Requirements-Based Change ensures changes respond to business and clinical needs, supporting changes being driven by clinical requirements.

B.Compliance with the Law is critical for a company operating in one of the most heavily regulated industries. This principle provides the foundation for ensuring the initiative meets all legal requirements for patient data handling. Interoperability ensuring systems can exchange and use information is important for cross-provider data sharing. Control Technical Diversity will be vital for standardizing the Al implementations across multiple divisions that share electronic health records with standardized medical coding.

C.Common Use Applications promotes standardization across divisions for the solutions, aligning with the company's existing practice of standardized medical coding. Information Management is Everybody ' s Business is relevant because clinical staff, administrative personnel, and IT teams all need to collaborate on information management decisions. Data is Accessible is highly relevant to the healthcare industry. This is needed for users to perform their functions and leads to efficiency and effectiveness.

D.Responsive Change Management emphasizes implementing changes in a timely manner to meet user needs and limiting downtime during change. Primacy of Principles makes it clear that the set of principles applies equally to all divisions and clinical departments. This will ensure that the regulatory requirements across the company are met. Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise will ensure that decisions are made to provide maximum benefit to the company.

Question 20

Scenario
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at a large government agency. The agency has multiple divisions.
The agency has a well-established EA practice and follows the TOGAF standard as its method for architecture development. Along with the EA program, the agency also uses various management frameworks, including business planning, project/portfolio management, and operations management. The EA program is sponsored by the Chief Information Officer (CIO), who has actively promoted architecting with agility within the EA department as her preferred approach for projects.
The government has mandated that the agency prepare themselves for an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-first world, which they have called their "AI-first" plan. As a result, the agency is looking to determine the impact and role that AI will play moving forward. The CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to look at how AI can be used for services across the agency. She has noted that digital platforms will be a priority for investment in order to scale the AI applications planned. Using AI to automate tasks and make things run smoother is seen as a big advantage. Process automation and improved efficiency from manual, repetitive activities have been identified as the key benefits of applying generative AI to their agency's business. This will include back-office automation, for example, for help center agents who receive hundreds of email inquiries. This should also improve services for citizens by making them more efficient and personalized, tailored to each individual's needs.
Many of the agency leaders are worried about relying too much on AI. Some leaders think their employees will need to learn new skills. Some employees are worried they might lose their jobs to AI. Other leaders worry about security and cyber resilience in the digital platforms needed for AI to be successful.
The leader of the Enterprise Architecture team has asked for your suggestions on how to address the concerns, and how to manage the risks of a new architecture for the AI-first project.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?

A.You recommend creating an Organization Map to display the links between different parts of the agency. This will help the EA team to find and involve all areas of the agency impacted by this strategic change. Multiple business models should then be created that can be applied to AI-related projects. A meeting will be held with the stakeholders to teach them how to interpret the models and see how their concerns are being addressed. Risk will be managed as part of the Security Architecture development.

B.You recommend that the key stakeholders be formally identified. This should include those who will be most helpful for the change to be successful. A Communication Plan should be made to address their needs. This plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture based on stakeholder requirements and addressing concerns. You communicate with each key stakeholder to make sure their concerns are being addressed. You make sure that the architecture being developed clearly addresses risk management.

C.You recommend conducting an analysis of the stakeholders. This involves documenting the positions, concerns, issues, and cultural factors of each group. This information will shape how the architecture is to be presented and communicated. The concerns and relevant views can then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document. The requirements for addressing risk should be recorded in the Architecture Requirements Specification and checked through regular assessments and feedback.

D.You recommend conducting an analysis that separates the different types of stakeholders into groups.They can be divided into categories: corporate functions, end-user organization, project team, external vendors, and external partners. A model will be developed for each stakeholder category to ensure that all the necessary information and actions are taken into account. Meetings will be arranged with stakeholders to verify that their concerns have been adequately addressed. Risk management will be included in this process.

Correct Answer: C

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation
Context of the Scenario
The agency is initiating a strategic "AI-first" plan to transform processes using AI and improve efficiency while ensuring service improvements for citizens. Several stakeholder concerns have been raised, such as:
Job security for employees.
Skill development for adapting to new technologies.
Cybersecurity and resilience risks due to reliance on digital platforms.
TOGAF emphasizes the importance of stakeholder management, communication, and risk management to ensure successful adoption and implementation of new architecture. These concerns need to be addressed methodically by gathering requirements, analyzing stakeholder positions, and ensuring proper communication of risks and benefits.
Option Analysis
Option A:
Strengths:
Proposes creating an Organization Map to identify the links between different parts of the agency and the impact of the strategic change.
Suggests holding stakeholder meetings to address concerns.
Includes managing risks as part of Security Architecture development.
Weaknesses:
Focusing solely on creating business models and teaching stakeholders how to interpret them does not directly address cultural and positional concerns about job loss, skill development, and security.
Risk management is addressed as part of Security Architecture development but lacks broader integration into stakeholder requirements.
Conclusion: Incorrect, as it fails to systematically document stakeholder concerns and map them into requirements and architecture decisions.
Option B:
Strengths:
Highlights the importance of formal stakeholder identification and creating a Communication Plan.
Suggests addressing stakeholder concerns through communication and risk management.
Weaknesses:
Does not go into detail on analyzing stakeholder concerns, cultural positions, or specific requirements.
Lacks the inclusion of stakeholder feedback in architecture artifacts like the Architecture Vision or Requirements Specification, which are critical TOGAF outputs.
Conclusion: Incorrect, as it does not include a systematic and structured approach for stakeholder analysis and integration into architecture deliverables.
Option C:
Strengths:
Emphasizes conducting a thorough stakeholder analysis to document concerns, positions, and cultural factors, which aligns with TOGAF's approach in Phase A (Architecture Vision).
Ensures stakeholder views and requirements are recorded in the Architecture Vision document and reflected in the Architecture Requirements Specification.
Includes continuous assessment and feedback, ensuring concerns are addressed and risks managed effectively.
Aligns with TOGAF ' s principle of involving stakeholders in architecture development to ensure alignment and success.
Weaknesses:
Could further detail how risk management is included across all phases, but this is implied through integration into the Architecture Requirements Specification.
Conclusion: Correct, as it provides a structured and detailed approach for addressing stakeholder concerns and managing risks within TOGAF's framework.
Option D:
Strengths:
Suggests categorizing stakeholders into groups and creating models for each category.
Proposes arranging meetings to verify that concerns have been addressed.
Includes risk management as part of the process.
Weaknesses:
Dividing stakeholders into generic categories (e.g., corporate functions, project team) may not adequately capture specific cultural factors and concerns raised in the scenario.
Lacks integration of stakeholder feedback into architecture deliverables such as the Architecture Vision and Architecture Requirements Specification.
Conclusion: Incorrect, as it provides a generalized and less targeted approach to stakeholder concerns compared to Option C.
TOGAF References
Stakeholder Management (Phase A): TOGAF emphasizes analyzing stakeholders' positions, concerns, and issues to shape architecture development and communication (TOGAF 9.2, Section 24.2).
Architecture Vision: Captures high-level requirements and stakeholder views to ensure alignment with business goals (TOGAF 9.2, Section 6.2).
Architecture Requirements Specification: Records detailed requirements, including those related to risk management, to guide the development of target architectures (TOGAF 9.2, Section 35.5).
Iterative Feedback: Regular assessments and feedback loops are critical to ensure stakeholder concerns are addressed effectively throughout the ADM cycle.
By selecting Option C, the approach adheres to TOGAF ' s principles of stakeholder analysis, communication, and integration of concerns into architecture development.

Question 16

Question 17

Question 18

Question 19

Question 20

Download PDF File