Within the CBCI EDGE curriculum, wall material selection affects not only embodied carbon under the materials category but also operational energy performance. The thermal properties of wall assemblies, including U-value, thermal mass, conductivity, and insulation levels, directly influence the building's heat transfer characteristics. These factors determine how much heat enters or escapes through the building envelope, thereby affecting cooling and heating loads.
When wall materials provide improved insulation or higher thermal mass, they reduce unwanted heat gains in hot climates and heat losses in cooler climates. This results in lower energy demand for HVAC systems. In the EDGE software, envelope performance improvements are reflected in the energy calculations under the improved case scenario, contributing to overall percentage energy savings.
Window to Wall Ratio is a geometric design parameter and is not determined by wall material choice. Internal heat gains are primarily influenced by occupants, lighting, and equipment rather than wall composition. Solar Heat Gain Coefficient refers specifically to glazing performance, not opaque wall materials. Therefore, aside from embodied carbon impacts, wall material selection most directly affects the building's energy consumption.

The EDGE software uses a quasi-steady-state calculation methodology for estimating building energy performance. This approach simplifies energy modeling by calculating heat gains and losses based on steady- state assumptions over defined time intervals, rather than performing detailed hour-by-hour simulations. The quasi-steady-state method allows EDGE to provide rapid and consistent energy performance assessments while maintaining sufficient technical accuracy for early design decision-making.
Unlike dynamic simulation models, which require complex input data, specialized software, and detailed operational schedules, the EDGE methodology is designed to be accessible and user-friendly for architects, engineers, and developers in emerging markets. It evaluates energy performance by comparing a baseline case, derived from local climate data and standard building practices, with an improved case reflecting selected energy efficiency measures.
Actual field survey energy data is not used because EDGE is primarily a design-stage predictive tool rather than a post-occupancy measurement system. Similarly, the calculations are not based solely on simplified look-up tables or rules of thumb. The quasi-steady-state model strikes a balance between technical rigor and usability, which is a core principle emphasized in the CBCI EDGE curriculum.

The EDGE software requires users to select a building type (typology) to model resource consumption accurately, and the choice depends on the scope of the certification. In this scenario, a tenant on the third floor (an office floor) of a medium-rise building seeks EDGE certification. The EDGE User Guide provides guidance on selecting building types for tenant spaces: "When a tenant within a larger building seeks EDGE certification, the building type should reflect the tenant's space. For an office tenant on the third floor of a mixed-use building, the 'Office' typology should be selected, as the certification applies only to the tenant's space, not the entire building, unless the whole building is being certified" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2:
Project Setup). Option A, Office, aligns with this guidance, as the tenant's space is an office. Option B (Retail) is incorrect, as the retail floors are on the first two levels, not the third: "Retail typology would apply if the tenant space were on the retail floors, not the office floors" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Option C (Mixed-use) is also incorrect, as this typology applies to the entire building, not a single tenant space: "Mixed-use typology is used when the entire building, including all uses (e.g., retail and offices), is being certified, not for individual tenant spaces" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section
2.1: Calculation Approach). Option D (Core and Shell) is typically used for buildings certified up to the core and shell stage, not for tenant fit-outs: "Core and Shell typology applies to buildings certified without tenant fit-outs, focusing on the building envelope and systems, not individual tenant spaces like an office" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.2: Scope of EDGE Standard). The EDGE User Guide further clarifies: "For tenant-led certifications, the typology should match the tenant's use-e.g., 'Office' for an office tenant-even if the building has multiple uses, ensuring the Base Case reflects the tenant's specific consumption patterns" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Since the tenant on the third floor operates an office, the Office typology (Option A) is the correct choice for EDGE certification.
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 2.2: Project Setup; EDGE Methodology Report Version
2.0, Section 2.1: Calculation Approach; EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.2: Scope of EDGE Standard.

The EDGE software uses a Base Case to establish a benchmark for resource consumption, tailored to local conditions. The EDGE Methodology Report explains how the Base Case is constructed: "The Base Case for external wall materials in hotels is determined using data from market surveys of typical building practices in the project's country, supplemented by national building performance codes where available. This ensures the baseline reflects local construction norms and regulatory standards" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 3.1: Base Case Determination). Option A matches this description by referencing typical building practices and national codes. Option B incorrectly refers to global practices and international codes, which EDGE does not use, as the software prioritizes local context. Option C, focusing on corporate specifications, is not part of the Base Case methodology, as the Base Case is standardized, not project-specific. Option D, involving local suppliers or accreditation, is irrelevant to how EDGE determines the Base Case, which relies on broader market data rather than supplier-specificinformation.
Reference:EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 3.1: Base Case Determination; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 2.3: Using the EDGE App.

The CBCI EDGE curriculum distinguishes clearly between eligibility to attend the EDGE Expert training and eligibility to be licensed or recognized as an EDGE Expert. For attending the training itself, the curriculum states that there is no formal prerequisite regarding qualifications. This is because the training is designed to be accessible to a wide range of participants, including professionals who may support EDGE projects indirectly, students, and stakeholders who want to understand the EDGE standard and the certification process.
The stricter requirements such as having a bachelor's degree or having specific construction industry experience relate to later steps in the pathway, especially when a participant aims to progress from training attendance to formal credentialing, licensing, or professional recognition as an EDGE Expert. In other words, options B, C, and D reflect possible qualification pathways for becoming eligible for the credential, not for simply joining the training. Therefore, when the question asks specifically about the eligibility requirement to attend an EDGE Expert training, the correct answer is that there is no prerequisite regarding qualifications.