The exhibit shows a FortiGate configuration under config system fortiguard related to web filtering and FortiGuard options. There is a line:
set webfilter-force-off enable
According to official Fortinet documentation, the "webfilter-force-off" option, when enabled, causes the FortiGate to bypass web filtering for all traffic-even if a web filter profile is applied to a policy.
This override is typically used for troubleshooting or performance reasons and is documented as an explicit bypass feature.
If an administrator wants to enforce web filtering inspection, this setting must be disabled. The correct way to restore web filtering functionality is to run:
set webfilter-force-off disable
Once done, traffic passing through policies with web filter profiles will be inspected and filtered as per configuration. Other settings such as timeout or cache TTL do not bypass web filtering; they only affect operational nuances.
Reference:
FortiOS Administration Guide: Web Filtering, FortiGuard Options, "webfilter-force-off" CLI

The exhibit shows a FortiGate configuration under config system fortiguard related to web filtering and FortiGuard options. There is a line:
set webfilter-force-off enable
According to official Fortinet documentation, the " webfilter-force-off " option, when enabled, causes the FortiGate to bypass web filtering for all traffic-even if a web filter profile is applied to a policy.
This override is typically used for troubleshooting or performance reasons and is documented as an explicit bypass feature.
If an administrator wants to enforce web filtering inspection, this setting must be disabled. The correct way to restore web filtering functionality is to run:
set webfilter-force-off disable
Once done, traffic passing through policies with web filter profiles will be inspected and filtered as per configuration. Other settings such as timeout or cache TTL do not bypass web filtering; they only affect operational nuances.
Reference:
FortiOS Administration Guide: Web Filtering, FortiGuard Options, "webfilter-force-off" CLI

The same study-guide slide also states other requirements such as:
peers' primary IPs must be in the same subnet with the same mask
hello and dead intervals must match
OSPF MTUs must match
Why the other options are wrong:
A is wrong because link cost matching is not listed as an adjacency requirement. OSPF cost affects path selection, not whether adjacency can form.
B is wrong because interface priority does not need to be unique. Priority is used for DR/BDR election, where the highest priority wins, and ties are broken by router ID.
So the verified answers are: C, D, E.
Explanation:
The correct answers are C, D, and E.
The study guide lists the exact OSPF adjacency requirements:
"Interfaces of peers are the same type and in the same OSPF area"
"Each peer has a unique router ID"
"OSPF authentication, if enabled, is successful"
These map directly to:

The correct answers are A and B.
The exhibit shows:
override: disable
both members are currently in-sync
only port7 appears under HBDEV stats, so it is the active heartbeat interface the cluster is in HA A-P mode Why A is correct:
With override disabled, after a failover the new primary keeps that role when the old primary comes back. The FortiOS administration guide states:
"When the primary FortiGate rejoins the cluster the secondary FortiGate continues to operate as the primary FortiGate." So if FGVM...649 reboots and FGVM...650 becomes primary, FGVM...650 will remain primary after FGVM...649 rejoins.
Why B is correct:
The study guide states:
"When FortiGate devices configured in an HA cluster lose communication with each other on the heartbeat interface, each FortiGate assumes the role of the primary device." The exhibit shows only port7 as the heartbeat device in HBDEV stats So if port7 is disconnected and heartbeat communication is lost, the cluster can enter a split-brain condition, where both units believe they are primary. The FortiOS administration guide confirms the same behavior: loss of heartbeat communication causes each member to think it is the primary Why the other options are wrong:
C is wrong because configuration synchronization status is specifically used to detect whether secondary members remain synchronized with the primary. If members are no longer synchronized, the status changes from in-sync to out-of-sync D is wrong because the study guide explains that during a configuration change, checksums may differ briefly while changes are copied, but it does not describe this as the secondary initiating a "synchronization reset" So the verified answers are: A, B.