Free Access Fortinet.FCSS_NST_SE-7.6.v2026-11-12.q125 Practice Test (Page 7)

Question 26

Refer to the exhibit, which shows a partial output of the real-time LDAP debug.

What two actions can the administrator take to resolve this issue? (Choose two.)

A.Ensure the user is a member of at least one AD group to ensure step 4 of the LDAP authentication process is successful.

B.Ensure the user is providing the correct user credentials.

C.Ensure the account is active.

D.Ensure the user logs in using 'John Smith' not 'jsmith'.

Question 27

Refer to the exhibit.

The administrator did not override the FortiGuard FODN or IP address in the FortiGate configuration Which IP address did FortiGate get when resolving the servicem,fortiguard.net name?

A.208.91.112.194

B.209.22.147.36

C.64.26.151.37

D.96.45.33.65

Question 28

Refer to the exhibits.

An administrator is attempting to advertise the network configured on port3. However, FGT-A is not receiving the prefix.
Which two actions can the administrator take to fix this problem? (Choose two.)

A.Use the set network-import-check disable command.

B.Manually add the BGP route on FGT-A.

C.Modify the prefix using the network command from 172.16.0.0/16 to 172.16.54.0/24.

D.Restart BGP using a soft reset to force both peers to exchange their complete BGP routing tables.

Question 29

Refer to the exhibit.

A partial output from an IKE real-time debug is shown
The administrator does not have access to (he remote gateway
Based on the debug output, which two conclusions can you draw? (Choose two.)

A.The remote peer is the initiating peer.

B.This is a phase1 negotiation.

C.There is a Diffie-Hellman group mismatch.

D.This is a phase2 negotiation

Correct Answer: A,B

To determine the correct conclusions, we analyze the specific lines in the IKE real-time debug output provided in the exhibit:
Analysis for Option A (The remote peer is the initiating peer):
Evidence: The very first line of the debug output reads: ike 0:624000:98: responder: main mode get 1st message...
The keyword responder indicates that this local FortiGate is receiving the connection request. Consequently, the remote peer must be the initiator sending the request. The phrase "get 1st message" confirms the local unit is receiving the initial packet of the negotiation sequence.
Conclusion: This statement is True.
Analysis for Option B (This is a phase 1 negotiation):
Evidence: The same line mentions main mode.
In IPsec VPNs, Main Mode and Aggressive Mode are exclusively used for Phase 1 (IKE SA) negotiations. Phase 2 (Child SA) negotiations use Quick Mode. The presence of "main mode" definitively identifies this as a Phase 1 exchange.
Conclusion: This statement is True.
Analysis for Option C (There is a Diffie-Hellman group mismatch):
Evidence:
Incoming proposal (Remote): Lists type=OAKLEY_GROUP, val=MODP2048 (Group 14) in the first proposal proposal.
My proposal (Local): Lists type=OAKLEY_GROUP, val=MODP2048 (Group 14).
Since both the remote peer and the local gateway support and are proposing MODP2048 (Group 14), there is no Diffie-Hellman group mismatch. The actual mismatch visible in the logs is between the Encryption/Hash algorithms (Remote proposes AES-256/SHA2-256, while Local proposes AES-128/SHA), but the DH groups match.
Conclusion: This statement is False.
Analysis for Option D (This is a phase 2 negotiation):
As established in the analysis for Option B, "Main Mode" is a Phase 1 protocol. If this were Phase 2, the debug would show "Quick Mode".
Conclusion: This statement is False.
Reference:
FortiGate Security 7.6 Study Guide (IPsec VPN): "Phase 1 modes: Main mode and Aggressive mode." FortiOS Debugging documentation: Explains that "responder" indicates the device receiving the IKE initialization.

Question 30

Refer to the exhibits.

An administrator Is expecting to receive advertised route 8.8.8.8/32 from FGT-A. On FGT-B, they confirm that the route is being advertised and received, however, the route is not being injected into the routing table.
What is the most likely cause of this issue?

A.A batter route to the 8.8.8.8/32 network exists in the routing table.

B.The administrator has misconfigured redistribution of routes on FGT-A.

C.FGT-B is configured with a prefix list denying the 8.8.8.8/32 network to be injected into the routing table.

D.FGT-8 is configured with a distribution list denying the 8.8.8.8/32 network to be injected into the routing table.

Other Version: 1134Fortinet.FCSS_NST_SE-7.6.v2026-08-01.q103

Latest Upload: 112Fortinet.FCSS_NST_SE-7.6.v2026-11-12.q125; 116Salesforce.AP-216.v2026-11-12.q44; 166Juniper.JN0-281.v2026-11-11.q85; 175Lpi.010-160.v2026-11-11.q101; 137PECB.ISO-IEC-27002-Foundation.v2026-11-11.q39; 233Huawei.H12-323_V2.0.v2026-11-11.q259; 135Microsoft.AB-900.v2026-11-10.q89; 145Juniper.JN0-351.v2026-11-09.q113; 166NVIDIA.NCP-OUSD.v2026-11-09.q68; 154InsuranceLicensing.NY-Independent-General-Adjuster.v2026-11-07.q35

Question 26

Question 27

Question 28

Question 29

Question 30

Download PDF File