Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References Clause 10.2 of ISO 45001 pertains to Nonconformity and Corrective Action. Organizations are required to evaluate incidents, investigate their causes, and implement effective corrective actions to prevent recurrence.
* Issue Identified:The incidents in the five old shops are related to VOC emissions from outdated equipment, leading to staff and customer health concerns. This indicates inadequate risk management and failure to act on known safety issues.
* Analysis of Options:
* A. Display an emergency phone number.This is a reactive approach and does not address the root cause of the issue, i.e., VOC emissions. It also does not align with ISO 45001's emphasis on preventive measures.
* B. Evaluate and update the PPE requirements.While PPE is important, relying solely on PPE without addressing the root cause (emission of VOCs) is insufficient. PPE is considered the last line of defense under the hierarchy of controls.
* C. Reassess the OH&S risks associated with the laundry process in the five old shops.This option aligns with ISO 45001, Clause 8.1.2, and Clause 10.2, as it emphasizes reassessing risks and taking steps to mitigate them. A thorough risk assessment could lead to interim measures such as process improvements or administrative controls until the equipment is replaced.
* D. Review the current safety procedures.While reviewing safety procedures is useful, it does not address the specific nonconformity related to the equipment's inability to operate safely.
* Best Action:Reassessing the risks in the five shops (Option C) ensures a comprehensive review of the hazards posed by outdated equipment, leading to appropriate preventive and corrective actions.
ISO References:
* Clause 10.2: Requires identifying and addressing nonconformities to prevent recurrence.
* Clause 8.1.2: Emphasizes the hierarchy of controls and risk assessment as a foundation for mitigating hazards.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit Reference Clause 9.1.2 of ISO 45001:2018 outlines the need for organizations to evaluate compliance with applicable legal and other requirements as part of their OH&S management system.
Analysis of Options:
A :The organization must evaluate its compliance status at least once a year:
The standard does not prescribe a specific frequency but states that evaluations must be conducted at planned intervals.
B :'Other requirements' include requirements that the organization has chosen to comply with:
Correct. Other requirements may include voluntary standards, industry codes, or contractual obligations.
C :A management review is required in all instances where one or more legal requirements are not being met:
This is not true. Management reviews address compliance but are not mandated for every noncompliance.
D :Every member of an audit team must have a detailed understanding of the legal requirements for the sector and type of organization they are auditing:
Not true. Auditors must have general competency but can rely on subject-matter experts for legal specifics.
E :If the organization is failing to address a legal requirement relating to another discipline (e.g., Environmental management), this cannot be raised in the audit:
Not true. If the legal noncompliance impacts OH&S, it can be raised.
F :The organization cannot outsource its process for evaluating compliance:
The organization can outsource evaluation but retains accountability.
G:The organization is required to establish a process for evaluating compliance:
Correct. Clause 9.1.2 requires a process for compliance evaluation.
H :The organization is required to evaluate its compliance status with OH&S legal and other requirements:
Correct. Clause 9.1.2 explicitly states this requirement.
ISO Reference:
Clause 9.1.2: Evaluation of compliance.
Clause 7.5: Documented information requirements

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit Reference Clause 8.1.2 of ISO 45001 pertains to Eliminating Hazards and Reducing OH&S Risks. Organizations must implement appropriate controls to manage workplace hazards effectively.
Issue Identified:
The kitchen environment at the audited site presents multiple hazards, including:
Oil spillage creating a slip hazard.
Open drums of waste material posing a chemical or hygiene hazard.
Unsecured knives and cleavers increasing the risk of cuts.
Boiling water left unattended, posing a risk of burns.
Lack of visible fire extinguishers or fire blankets, increasing fire risk.
Analysis of Options:
A . Failure to reduce risks associated with working in the kitchen.
This option accurately captures the broader failure to implement effective measures to eliminate or reduce hazards across multiple areas in the kitchen.
B . Measures to prevent slippage in the kitchen from waste cooking oil were not taken.
This is specific to one hazard (oil spillage) and does not address other significant risks observed, such as fire safety or sharp tools.
C . Staff are at risk of serious injury while working in the kitchen.
While true, this is more of a general observation and does not address the root cause of the hazards or the failure of controls.
D . Training of the kitchen staff was not effective enough to prevent poor safety awareness in the kitchen area.
Although training deficiencies may contribute to the issue, this option does not reflect the overarching systemic failure to manage hazards effectively.
Best Description of the Nonconformance:
Failure to reduce risks associated with working in the kitchen (Option A) is the most comprehensive finding, reflecting the organization's lack of adequate controls to mitigate hazards.
ISO Reference:
Clause 8.1.2: Organizations must establish controls to eliminate or minimize OH&S risks systematically.
Clause 7.2: Ensuring competency through training is important but must be coupled with hazard control measures.

Follow-up audits verify that corrective actions have been implemented effectively and address the root cause of the nonconformities.
Analysis of Options:
A . Review the latest emergency response drill report:
Correct. This verifies whether emergency response processes are functional and effective.
B . Check if the internal audit schedule was revised:
Incorrect. While beneficial, this is not directly related to closing out the nonconformity.
C . Check safety data sheets for completeness:
Incorrect. While this ensures compliance, it is not directly related to verifying corrective actions.
D . Check if revised procedures were signed off:
Correct. This confirms that changes were properly documented and approved.
E . Determine whether an updated risk assessment was carried out:
Correct. Risk assessments confirm the effectiveness of new controls.
F . Inspect areas for safe chemical storage and handling:
Correct. Direct observation ensures that corrective actions are implemented effectively.
G . Interview staff on revised emergency procedures:
Incorrect. While important, this does not directly address the effectiveness of corrective actions for chemical storage.
H . Interview the OH&S Manager about additional objectives:
Incorrect. This is unrelated to the specific nonconformities raised.
ISO Reference:
Clause 10.2.2: Verification of corrective actions.
Clause 8.1.2: Hazard identification and controls.