See the solution inExplanation partbelow.
Explanation:
How to approach this question:
- This is the type of question you either know or you don't. You can't really guess it. So do memorise it.
There's not really a shortcut here.
- The CIPS Code of Conduct is an ethical standard and framework which is used profession-wise. The purpose is to standardise ethics across the profession.
- There are 5 aspects to the Code of Conduct: enhance and protect the standing of the profession, promote the eradication of unethical business practices, maintain integrity in all business relationships, enhance proficiency and stature of the profession and ensure full compliance with law and regulations.
Example Essay:
The Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply (CIPS) Code of Conduct is a comprehensive set of principles and standards that guide the ethical conduct of procurement and supply professionals. Adhering to this code is crucial for maintaining integrity, transparency, and responsible behaviour within the procurement profession. Here's an overview of the CIPS Code of Conduct along with examples of how organizations can ensure compliance with these standards:
1 - Enhance and protect the standing of the profession.
This means don't bring the profession into disrepute by your actions, don't accept gifts or offers of hospitality and to be aware that behaviour outside work reflects one's reputation as a professional. An organisation can implement training programs to educate procurement professionals about the importance of maintaining high standards of professionalism and integrity in their interactions with suppliers and stakeholders.
2 - Promote the eradication of unethical business practices.
This means fostering awareness of human rights, fraud and corruption issues in business relationships, responsibly managing business relationships if unethical practices come to light, undertaking due diligence (in respect to forced labour, fraud, corruption) and continually develop one's own personal knowledge of ethical issues. Promoting the eradication of unethical business practices requires a comprehensive and proactive approach from organizations. This involves having a strong CSR policy, having whistleblowing protection and reporting mechanisms, and conducting due diligence on the supply chain.
3 - Maintain integrity in all business relationships.
An organisation can show compliance with this by; rejecting improper business practices, never using authority for personal gain, declaring conflicts of interest, giving accurate information, not breaching confidentiality, striving for genuine, fair and transparent competition and being truthful about skills and experience. An example of this is for an organisation to sever ties with unethical businesses. One notable example of a retailer terminating a relationship with a supplier due to ethical reasons is the case of H&M and its decision to cut ties with a Chinese yarn producer in Xinjiang province. H&M, a global fashion retailer, announced in early 2021 that it would no longer source cotton from Xinjiang due to concerns over forced labour and human rights abuses associated with cotton production in the region.
4 - Enhance proficiency and stature of the profession.
Activities which would demonstrate compliance with this includes: Continual development of knowledge and skills, fostering the highest standards of competence in staff members at the organisation and optimising the responsible use of resources. For procurement staff, this could involve becoming MCIPS qualified, and even once qualified, completing routine CPD (Continued Professional Development) to ensure their knowledge and skills remain updated and relevant. They should also strive to share their knowledge with the wider organisation.
5 - Ensure full compliance with law and regulations.
An organisation can demonstrate compliance with the standard by proving they: follow the law in all countries they do business in, fulfilling all contractual obligations and following the CIPS guidance on professional practice. Compliance can include aspects of fiduciary responsibility such as paying the correct level of tax and filing returns on time, as well as compliance to legislation such as the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Equalities Act 2000.
In conclusion, the CIPS Code of Conduct is a voluntary standard for organisations to follow but it sets a high standard for the industry. By following the CIPS Code of Conduct organisations can enhance their reputation and levels of trust among stakeholders, as well as being reassured that following these clear ethical guidelines contribute to a positive workplace culture, boosting employee morale and commitment by fostering a sense of shared values.
Tutor Notes:
- Under the previous syllabus CIPS asked this question a lot. If you memorise one thing from the study guide I'd recommend it be this. Even if it doesn't come up as a stand-alone question, you can work it into more general essays about ethics- so it is useful to know.
- For a top score, try to give deep examples. So where you have said 'responsibly managing business relationships' you could explain what this means in practice- by ensuring fair contract terms are put in place, holding suppliers to account when they do something wrong and not exploiting smaller suppliers. Where you have said 'complete Due Diligence' you could mention that this would be completed before awarding a contract to a supplier and would involve looking at a supplier's history and supply chain to ensure that they have not been involved in any crimes (fraud etc) or unethical behaviour (such as polluting the environment).
The more in depth you go, the more you show the examiner your understanding, and the higher you'll score.
- p. 137 or here: Cips Code of Conduct | CIPS Note the study guide talks on p. 132 about the CIPS Code of Ethics, which is slightly different. The Code of Conduct is the main one to learn.

See the solution inExplanation partbelow.
Explanation:
- This is essentially two mini essays, so you can do them completely separately if you like.
1) Definition of centralised procurement - when an organisation has a designated procurement function which makes purchases on behalf of other teams. When departments need to make a purchase, they would do this by approaching the procurement department who would purchase the item they need. This is in contrast to devolved procurement where departments can make purchases themselves.
2)Explanation:of 2 forms of hybrid structures- there's a couple in the study guide you can pick from - consortium, shared services, lead buyer and outsourced. In the old syllabus they used to discuss SCAN - Strategically Controlled Action Network and CLAN = Centre Led Action Network. This has been removed from the new syllabus, but I don't think it would be wrong to use SCAN and CLAN in this essay if you wanted to. However they are more complicated than the others and if you can talk about other models instead I'd definitely go for that.
Example Essay:
Centralized procurement refers to a procurement strategy where an organization consolidates its purchasing activities into a single, central department or unit. Instead of allowing individual departments or divisions within the organization to independently manage their procurement processes, centralized procurement involves the concentration of these activities under a unified structure.
Key features of centralized procurement include:
1) Single Procurement Authority: In a centralized procurement system, there is a designated procurement authority or department responsible for handling all purchasing decisions. This central entity has the authority to negotiate contracts, select suppliers, and make procurement-related decisions on behalf of the entire organization.
2) Streamlined Processes: Centralized procurement aims to standardize and streamline procurement processes across the organization. This can include the establishment of uniform procurement policies, procedures, and documentation to ensure consistency and efficiency.
3) Economies of Scale: By consolidating purchasing power, centralized procurement allows organizations to leverage economies of scale. Bulk purchases, standardized contracts, and negotiations with suppliers on a larger scale can lead to cost savings and more favourable terms.
4) Improved Coordination and Communication: Centralized procurement enhances coordination and communication within the organization. With a centralized structure, there is better visibility into overall procurement activities, allowing for improved collaboration, information sharing, and strategic planning.
Moreover, this centralized control helps manage risks, ensure transparency, and monitor adherence to ethical and legal standards.
5) Consolidated Supplier Relationships: Centralized procurement enables the organization to consolidate its relationships with suppliers. This can lead to stronger partnerships, better negotiation positions, and improved collaboration with a select group of suppliers that meet the organization's needs.
6) Strategic Decision-Making: Centralized procurement allows organizations to make strategic decisions at a higher level. This includes aligning procurement strategies with overall organizational goals, optimizing the supply chain, and contributing to broader business objectives.
An example of centralised procurement would be in a hotel chain with several hotels across the UK. In a centralised procurement function there would be one team responsible for ordering everything for all of the hotels, rather than allowing the individual hotels to buy things themselves. Premier Inn is an example of a company that uses this structure- it allows them to buy stock in bulk and ensures that all hotels have the same equipment so customers expectations are always met.
Centralized procurement is often contrasted with decentralized procurement, where individual departments or business units manage their procurement independently (i.e. each hotel would buy their own supplies). The choice between centralized and decentralized procurement depends on various factors, including the size and structure of the organization, the nature of its operations, and the specific goals it aims to achieve through its procurement processes.
Consortium Procurement Model:
The consortium procurement model is characterized by the collaboration of multiple organizations forming a joint group (the consortium) to engage in collective buying activities. Typically composed of entities from the same industry or sector, these organizations unite their resources, expertise, and purchasing power to pursue shared procurement objectives. The consortium leverages this collective strength to negotiate contracts, conduct bulk purchases, and benefit from economies of scale, resulting in cost savings and increased operational efficiency. The UK University sector is an example of Consortium activities- many universities come together to 'group buy' items as this brings about many benefits.
The main benefit of this form of hybrid procurement model is the increased negotiating power and leverage derived from combining the purchasing volumes of participating entities. This often results in more favourable terms, competitive prices (through bulk purchases), and improved conditions with suppliers. Additionally, consortium buying allows organizations to share resources, knowledge, and expertise, fostering a collaborative environment that enhances overall procurement capabilities. By working together, consortium members can collectively address challenges, negotiate strategically, and navigate the procurement landscape more effectively.
However, consortium buying is not without its challenges. A potential disadvantage lies in the complexity of managing a collaborative procurement structure, involving coordinationamong diverse entities. Achieving consensus on procurement strategies, vendor selection, and contract terms may require considerable effort and compromise. Additionally, individual organizational needs and preferences within the consortium may differ, posing challenges in aligning priorities. It is essential to strike a balance between centralized decision-making and accommodating the specific requirements of each consortium member. Furthermore, the success of consortium buying relies heavily on effective communication and trust among participants. Any breakdown in communication or lack of trust could hinder the collaborative process, impacting the overall efficiency and success of the consortium's procurement endeavours.
Overall, while consortium buying offers notable advantages, its effectiveness is contingent on careful management of collaborative dynamics and effective communication strategies.
Shared Services Procurement Model:
In the shared services procurement model, various departments or business units within a single organization converge under a centralized procurement function. Rather than individual units managing their procurement independently, a dedicated shared services centre is established to provide procurement-related services across the organization. This model facilitates streamlined processes, ensures consistency through standardized procedures, and capitalizes on economies of scale.
One key benefit is the potential for cost savings through economies of scale. By centralizing procurement, the organization can negotiate bulk purchases and standardized contracts, leading to better terms and prices. This consolidation of purchasing power enables the organization to optimize its resources and achieve overall cost efficiency. Additionally, centralized procurement allows for streamlined processes, standardized procedures, and better control over procurement activities. It promotes consistency, reduces redundancy, and ensures adherence to organizational policies and compliance requirements.
However, there are also potential disadvantages to centralized procurement. One notable challenge is the potential for reduced flexibility in meeting the unique needs of individual departments or business units within the organization. Centralization may lead to standardized approaches that might not be well-suited for all units, potentially impacting their specific requirements. Furthermore, the centralization of decision-making can result in increased bureaucracy and longer decision-making processes, potentially slowing down procurement activities. Additionally, there may be resistance from decentralized units that are accustomed to managing their procurement independently. Striking a balance between centralized control and accommodating the diverse needs of various units is crucial for the success of centralized procurement.
In conclusion, both the consortium and shared services procurement models represent strategies to enhance efficiency, realize cost savings, and optimize procurement processes. While the consortium model involves collaboration with external entities, the shared services model centralizes procurement functions within a single organization. The choice between these models depends on the unique goals, structure, and requirements of the organizations involved, each offering distinct advantages in the pursuit of effective procurement management.
Tutor Notes:
- This is from LO 3.3 p.161 onwards. There's quite a bit of information on these hybrid models so there's many ways it can come up as a question. There are different types of consortium, which I didn't go into in the above essay because it wasn't asked for as part ofthe question, but I'd familiarise yourself with this. Also with the pros and cons of each model, and think about when an organisation may choose this type of model.

See the solution inExplanation partbelow.
Explanation:
How to approach this question:
- Define stakeholder mapping - completing an analysis of the stakeholders of an organisation and dividing them into categories depending on certain characteristics. This is often represented visually on a graph or matrix.
- Describe a Stakeholder mapping tool - the most common tool is Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix so I would recommend using this one. It is explained in detail in the study guide. However, the question is open so you could choose to describe another tool such as Edgar's Stakeholder Position Analysis if you so wished. You wouldn't be wrong choosing this, but honestly, I'd just go for Mendelow. You can't go wrong with Mendelow.
Because the Matrix has 4 sections you can imagine you'd get 5 points for the definition of stakeholder mapping, and 5 points for each of the quadrants of the matrix.
Essay Plan:
Introduction - The reason why stakeholder mapping is important is because interests and expectations of stakeholder groups will be different and possibly conflicting. Mapping this allows an organisation to see the variety and decide on an appropriate management style for each stakeholder group.
Paragraph 1 - Mendelow's Power / Interest Matrix maps stakeholders based on their influencing power and the strength of their motivation to use that power. It uses a 2x2 grid and defines power as high or low and interest and high or low. It then provides four strategies for managing the stakeholders based on which quadrant of the grid the stakeholder falls into. These 4 categories are:
Paragraph 2 - Keep satisfied - high power but low interest. If the stakeholder becomes dissatisfied or concerned their interest may peak. Examples include regulatory bodies, shareholders, senior management. The best approach is to keep them up to date so they are informed of what is going on, but do not burden them with information they do not need.
Paragraph 3 - Manage Closely - AKA Key players - includes major customers, key suppliers, partners, senior management. These stakeholders need to know everything that is going on and approve of what is going on.
The recommended strategy is early involvement and participation, and integrating their goals with yours. This group requires regular communication and meetings. You should take their opinions on board.
Paragraph 4- Monitor - minimum effort required - this is the low priority group as they have low power and low interest. Includes small volume suppliers and other organisational functions with no direct interest in your activities. This group does not need to receive regular communication.
Paragraph 5 - Keep informed - high interest, but low power. If they're not kept in the loop and understand the need for decisions, they may lobby together to protect their interest if they feel threatened. Employee groups, suppliers and community groups may be in this category. This group should receive regular communication.
Conclusion - Mendelow created the matrix in 1991 and it is still used today. It is a popular management tool due to its simplicity. It's important to notes that stakeholders can move through the matrix- it isn't stagnant.
For example, at the beginning of a project a manager in another department may be classed as 'low priority' because they are seen to have no interest and no power in the project. However, as the project progresses the manager may become interested. They will then transfer into the keep informed category. Therefore, the matrix should be redone regularly throughout the lifetime of a project to capture any movements. The matrix should also be redone for each individual project - it cannot be assumed that a stakeholder who had interest in one project would be interested in another.
Tutor Notes
- The above essay plan is basically the entire essay, I got carried away. The only thing you'd need to add into that is an example of a stakeholder for each of the sections! (e.g. the CEO is high power, but low interest stakeholder for the procurement department. He/ She doesn't care about the day to day operations but should be kept informed of any big news). For your examples you could use your own place of work.
- At level 4 you don't have to analyse the model, you just have to be able to memorise it and repeat it.
Mendelow comes up again at Level 5 and 6 in a bit more detail. If you want to score super bonus points you could mention in your conclusion that the main disadvantage of Mendelow's Matrix is that it doesn't take into consideration the stakeholder's position on the project - whether they're for it or against it. Therefore, it doesn't provide the full picture or provide much help on how to manage stakeholders. E.g. two stakeholders might both be in 'manage closely' section, but one is for the project and the other against - they'd need to be handled very differently!
- Study guide p. 65

See the solution inExplanation partbelow.
Explanation:
How to approach the question
Your answer should provide details on 3 of the following:
- Contract Award and Implementation
- Warehouse Logistics
- Contract performance and Improvement
- Supplier Relationship Management
- Asset Management
Because the question is only asking for 3 stages, you're going to have to go much more into detail for each stage, giving lots of information about why each stage is important and examples. You could consider thinking of an example procurement you have done recently and explaining the stages for that. Or you could take a hypothetical procurement too. Either will get you the same marks. Pick the three that you can write the most about.
Essay Plan
Introduction - explain that sourcing of goods and the role of Procurement doesn't end once a contract is signed. There is ongoing management and processes which must be carried out to ensure success.
Paragraph 1 - Contract Performance and Improvement
This is about ensuring contract obligations are fulfilled. Contract administration includes P2P procedures, database management, budgeting / costs monitoring, reporting and dispute resolution
Procurement's role may be in managing contract performance through the use of SLAs and / or KPIs. This can be done via reporting, using a Supplier Scorecard and meeting regularly to discuss.
It's important KPIs are measured and that there are consequences for failing to meet them. An example of consequences could be using a Performance Improvement Plan.
Contract Management also includes updating the contract where required - e.g. issuing variations to contract and updating the change control log
Another important aspect of this is ensuring the costs remain within scope of the budget
Contract performance can be compared if you have several suppliers delivering the same goods- could use a Factor Rating Method.
Performance could be measured against several criteria such as on time deliveries, response time of supplier, number of complaints.
Paragraph 2 - Supplier Relationship Management
There is a difference between managing the contract and managing the supplier relationship. It's possible to have excellent contract performance and a terrible relationship. However, the two are generally linked- where there is a good relationship, the contract often performs well.
The supplier management approach depends on where the relationship falls on the relationship spectrum (e.g.
transactional or collaborative)
This involves; maintaining regular contact with the supplier, motivating the supplier, working collaboratively with them (e.g. on performance issues or resolving any disputes)
Incentivising the supplier leads to collaboration and mutual support
To assess or rank suppliers you could use a vendor rating method or supplier evaluation forms
Supplier relationship management may involve investing in the supplier- e.g. through training or technology sharing Paragraph 3 - Asset Management
Includes creating a post contract 'lessons-learned'
Assessments should be carried out to determine if business requirements have changed, whether the agreement is still required and fit for purpose, what can be learnt from the process and how improvements can be incorporated next time.
This is the final stage of the Procurement Cycle and takes us back to the start of cycle, which begins again when the item needs to be reprocured
Whole life costing should be considered at this stage: this is the total cost of ownership over the life of an asset. The concept is also known as life-cycle cost (LCC) or lifetime cost, and is commonly referred to as
"cradle to grave" or "womb to tomb" costs.
Generally used on large purchases such as machinery and vehicles. Full Asset Management may not necessary for direct cost items such as raw materials incorporated into final goods.
Considerations may include; costs of running the asset, how long it will perform, insurance, maintenance, opportunity costs, disposing of the asset.
Also consider environmental and social impacts of the procurement.
Conclusion - it is important that procurement are involved at every stage of the cycle, not just in the pre-award stages. Procurement can add value at every stage.
Tutor Notes
- Depending on the examples you choose to use, you could talk about how the type of item procured could impact on the different stages. For example, high risk purchases may require more contract management than low risk purchases, and capital expenditure items such as new machinery may require more attention to the Asset Management stage.
- You could also think about how procurement adds value at each of the stages.
- Study guide p. 79

See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- Your essay should mention at least one regulation and one governing body particular to the charity section and I would recommend these be the Charities Act 2011 and the Charities Commission.
- If you don't know a lot about the sector you can bring up more generalised regulations and governing bodies, such as financial conduct and the Equalities Act, but make sure it's relevant to Sarah. Her charity is a small, local one, so things like Modern Slavery Act will not be appropriate to talk about.
Example Essay
When setting up a charity in the UK, particularly one focused on animal welfare, there are several regulations and governing bodies that Sarah should be aware of. These ensure that the charity operates legally, ethically, and effectively.
A charity's purpose involves raising awareness and helping someone or something, in Sarah's case this will be local animals and potentially their owners. A charity has to satisfy two aspects: The benefit aspect and The public aspect. In the UK, both aspects are regulated by the Charities Act 2011.
To satisfy a benefit aspect, a charity must: have a purpose that must be beneficial to the community it works in - this must be in a way that is identifiable and capable of being proved by evidence. For Sarah this would be showing that her charity helps animals, potentially by taking them in off the street or removing them from dangerous homes and caring for them.
To satisfy a public aspect, a charity must benefit the public in general, or a sufficient section of the public. In Sarah's case the public benefit may be in removing stray dogs and cats from the streets where they can transport diseases and potentially attack people. Most charities strive to satisfy both aspects but in some cases this is not possible.
All charities are regulated. Because charities are funded by donations from the public, businesses and sometimes from government, their conduct is regulated closely. Key regulatory bodies that Sarah will have to engage with include:
1. Charity Commission for England and Wales:
As the primary regulator for charities in England and Wales, the Charity Commission oversees the registration and regulation of charities. Sarah's organization must meet the legal definition of a charity and apply for registration if its income is over £5,000 per year.
The Commission ensures compliance with the Charities Act, offering guidance on charity governance, financial management, and reporting.
2. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC):
Charities can apply to HMRC for recognition as a charity for tax purposes. This status allows for tax reliefs and exemptions, including Gift Aid on donations.
HMRC ensures compliance with tax obligations and scrutinizes the use of charity funds.
3. Data Protection:
Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018, any charity handling personal data must ensure its protection and comply with data privacy laws.
4. Health and Safety Executive (HSE):
The HSE provides guidelines for workplace safety, which are important if the charity has employees or volunteers.
In conclusion there are many regulations and bodies that Sarah should be aware of when setting up her charity. Sarah should consider seeking legal advice or consulting with charity advisory services to ensure full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations. Additionally, staying informed about changes in charity law and animal welfare legislation would be beneficial to the smooth operation of her charity.
Tutor Notes
- With case study questions you're not expected to know anything about the specific topic, in this case Animal Charities. If it happens to be something you know about, you can bring in some of your own knowledge, but this isn't a requirement to get a good score. You're not expected to know, for example about the Animal Welfare Act 2006, but if you happen to do so, it could be a nice little thing to add in. Just don't focus your essay on it. However you can make some sensible guesses on what Sarah will be doing, for example I talked about removing stray animals from the street.
- Charities comes up in LO 4.4 p.232