Enabling dashboards for service status monitoring is the best action to support rapid incident response. The table shows various services with different risk, criticality, and alert severity ratings. To ensure timely and effective incident response, real-time visibility into the status of these services is crucial.
Why Dashboards for Service Status Monitoring?
Real-time Visibility: Dashboards provide an at-a-glance view of the current status of all critical services, enabling rapid detection of issues.
CentralizedMonitoring: A single platform to monitor the status of multiple services helps streamline incident response efforts.
Proactive Alerting: Dashboards can be configured to show alerts and anomalies immediately, ensuring that incidents are addressed as soon as they arise.
Improved Decision Making: Real-time data helps incident response teams make informed decisions quickly, reducing downtime and mitigating impact.
Other options, while useful, do not offer the same level of comprehensive, real-time visibility and proactive alerting:
A . Automate alerting to IT support for phone system outages: This addresses one service but does not provide a holistic view.
C . Send emails for failed log-in attempts on the public website: This is a specific alert for one type of issue and does not cover all services.
D . Configure automated isolation of human resources systems: This is a reactive measure for a specific service and does not provide real-time status monitoring.
Reference:
CompTIA SecurityX Study Guide
NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2, "Computer Security Incident Handling Guide"
"Best Practices for Implementing Dashboards," Gartner Research

The log-in activity indicates a security threat, particularly involving the ADMIN account with a high-risk failure status. This suggests that the account may be targeted by malicious activities such as credential stuffing or brute force attacks.
* Updating log configuration settings (A) may help in better logging future activities but does not
* address the immediate threat.
* Changing the admin account password (B) is a good practice but may not fully mitigate the ongoing threat if the account has already been compromised.
* Blocking employees (C) from logging into non-business applications might help in reducing attack surfaces but doesn't directly address the compromised account issue.
Implementing automation to disable accounts associated with high-risk activities ensures an immediate response to the detected threat, preventing further unauthorized access and allowing time for thorough investigation and remediation.
References:
* CompTIA SecurityX guide on incident response and account management.
* Best practices for handling compromised accounts.
* Automation tools and techniques for security operations centers (SOCs).

To develop a baseline of security configurations that will be automatically utilized when a machine is created, the security architect should deploy Ansible. Here's why:
* Automation: Ansible is an automation tool that allows for the configuration, management, and deployment of applications and systems. It ensures that security configurations are consistently applied across all new machines.
* Scalability: Ansible can scale to manage thousands of machines, making it suitable for large enterprises that need to maintain consistent security configurations across their infrastructure.
* Compliance: By using Ansible, organizations can enforce compliance with security policies and standards, ensuring that all systems are configured according to best practices.
* References:
* CompTIA Security+ SY0-601 Study Guide by Mike Chapple and David Seidl
* Ansible Documentation: Best Practices
* NIST Special Publication 800-40: Guide to Enterprise Patch Management Technologies